Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/6162
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMollee, Peteren
dc.contributor.authorJohn Reynoldsen
dc.contributor.authorWojt Janowskien
dc.contributor.authorHANG QUACHen
dc.contributor.authorPhilip Campbellen
dc.contributor.authorSimon Gibbsen
dc.contributor.authorSophie Leeen
dc.contributor.authorEdwin Leeen
dc.contributor.authorKerry Tayloren
dc.contributor.authorCochrane, Taraen
dc.contributor.authorCraig Wallington-Gatesen
dc.contributor.authorFiona Kwoken
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Nicholasen
dc.contributor.authorIan Kerridgeen
dc.contributor.authorWeston, Helenen
dc.contributor.authorP Joy Hoen
dc.contributor.authorMichael Francis Leahyen
dc.contributor.authorNoemi Horvathen
dc.contributor.authorAndrew Spenceren
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-08T02:53:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-08T02:53:54Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationBlood Advances, 2024en
dc.identifier.urihttps://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/6162-
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>In newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma, daratumumab has improved outcomes when added to the standard of care regimens. In a randomized trial, we tested whether similar improvements would be seen when daratumumab was added to the bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) regimen. Non-transplant eligible patients with untreated myeloma were randomized to receive VCD or VCD plus daratumumab (VCDD). 121 patients were randomized, 57 in the VCD arm and 64 in the VCDD arm. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two arms. The median PFS was 16.8m (95%CI 15.3 - 21.7m) and 25.8m (95%CI 19.9 - 33.5) in the VCD and VCDD arms, respectively (HR 0.67, log-rank test p=0.066). In a pre-planned analysis, the estimated PFS at fixed time-points post-randomization demonstrated significantly improved PFS for the daratumumab containing arm from 18 months onwards. The proportions of patients who were progression free at the following time points were: 18 months, 48% vs 68% (p=0.0002); 24 months, 36% vs 52% (p=0.0001); and 30 months, 27% vs 41% (p&lt;0.0001) in the VCD and VCDD arms, respectively. The best overall response and VGPR rate were significantly better in the daratumumab arm (65% vs 86%, p=0.007 and 28% vs 52%, p=0.009) for the VCD and VCDD arms, respectively. Seventy-two percent of the VCDD patients completed the 9 cycles of induction therapy with no grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy adverse events. This study supports VCDD as an option for the initial treatment of non-transplant eligible patients with myeloma. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000202369). https://www.anzctr.org.au/</jats:p>en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleDaratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone for non-transplant eligible myeloma (AMaRC 03-16)en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012539-
dc.rights.holderCraig Wallington-Gatesen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBlood Advances-
dc.identifier.external159541864-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Sites:Sunshine Coast HHS Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

54
checked on Jan 4, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.