Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/6159
Title: Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma
Authors: Pieter Sonneveld
Meletios A. Dimopoulos
Mario Boccadoro
Hang Quach
P. Joy Ho
Meral Beksac
Cyrille Hulin
Elisabetta Antonioli
Xavier Leleu
Silvia Mangiacavalli
Aurore Perrot
Michele Cavo
Angelo Belotti
Annemiek Broijl
Francesca Gay
Roberto Mina
Inger S. Nijhof
Niels W.C.J. Van De Donk
Eirini Katodritou
Fredrik Schjesvold
Anna Sureda Balari
Laura Rosiñol
Michel Delforge
Wilfried Roeloffzen
Tobias Silzle
Annette Vangsted
Hermann Einsele
Andrew Spencer
Roman Hajek
Artur Jurczyszyn
Sarah Lonergan
Tahamtan Ahmadi
Yanfang Liu
Jianping Wang
Diego Vieyra
Emilie M.J. Van Brummelen
Veronique Vanquickelberghe
Anna Sitthi-Amorn
Carla J. De Boer
Robin Carson
Paula Rodriguez-Otero
Joan Bladé
Philippe Moreau
PERSEUS Trial Investigators
Craig Wallington-Gates 
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Source: New England Journal of Medicine, 2024
Journal Title: New England Journal of Medicine
Abstract: Background: Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, has been approved for use with standard myeloma regimens. An evaluation of subcutaneous daratumumab combined with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) for the treatment of transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is needed.

Methods: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 709 transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma to receive either subcutaneous daratumumab combined with VRd induction and consolidation therapy and with lenalidomide maintenance therapy (D-VRd group) or VRd induction and consolidation therapy and lenalidomide maintenance therapy alone (VRd group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status.

Results: At a median follow-up of 47.5 months, the risk of disease progression or death in the D-VRd group was lower than the risk in the VRd group. The estimated percentage of patients with progression-free survival at 48 months was 84.3% in the D-VRd group and 67.7% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.59; P<0.001); the P value crossed the prespecified stopping boundary (P = 0.0126). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was higher in the D-VRd group than in the VRd group (87.9% vs. 70.1%, P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status (75.2% vs. 47.5%, P<0.001). Death occurred in 34 patients in the D-VRd group and 44 patients in the VRd group. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in most patients in both groups; the most common were neutropenia (62.1% with D-VRd and 51.0% with VRd) and thrombocytopenia (29.1% and 17.3%, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred in 57.0% of the patients in the D-VRd group and 49.3% of those in the VRd group.

Conclusions: The addition of subcutaneous daratumumab to VRd induction and consolidation therapy and to lenalidomide maintenance therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. (Funded by the European Myeloma Network in collaboration with Janssen Research and Development; PERSEUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03710603; EudraCT number, 2018-002992-16.).
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312054
metadata.dc.rights.holder: Craig Wallington-Gates
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Sunshine Coast HHS Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Jan 4, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.