Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/5845
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMargaret, M. E.-
dc.contributor.authorIrene, S.-
dc.contributor.authorJohanna, C.-
dc.contributor.authorLeanne, R.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-20T00:27:55Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-20T00:27:55Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationRespirology, 2023 (28) p.17en
dc.identifier.urihttps://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/5845-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Many spirometers used in primary care have inflexible software and graphics displays that are not user-friendly for achieving quality spirometry to international standards. Guidelines exist for spirometer technical features, and spirometry test quality and reports, 1,2 but there are no guides that identify user-friendly features for spirometers. Aim: To use expert opinion to develop a comprehensive list of user-friendly features for spirometers used in primary care. Method: Experts with suitable experience in spirometry were recruited from relevant networks; Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science, Queensland State-wide Clinical Networks, National Asthma Council and Primary Health Networks. Modified Delphi Consensus methodology 3 was used. The importance of 92 possible features (from 10 categories) were rated by experts using a 6-point Likert Scale; essential, very important, moderately important, low importance, not at all important or no opinion. Ethics waiver (EX/21/QCHQ/77717) was gained. Results: Thirty-six experts completed 2 rounds of the survey. We identified 67 features from the 10 categories where ≥75% of experts gave a rating of either 'essential' or 'very important'. This consensus threshold was considered a priori as a strong expert recommendation for a feature. Category Number of features where >75% experts scored essential or very important 1. General details 3 2. Calibration and biological controls 8 3. Infection control 4 4. Patient data 3 5. Data acquisition and display during testing session 16 6. Interpretation 6 7. Reports 13 8. Software downloads, technical support & user manual 4 9. Assessment of quality of trials 5 10. Other features and comments 5 Total 67 Conclusion: Australia-wide expert opinion has been used to develop a comprehensive list of features that make spirometers user-friendly for achieving quality spirometry in primary care. The list provides a valuable evidence-based resource for health workers and managers in primary and community care when purchasing a spirometer to achieve quality testing and also for manufacturers seeking to improve their spirometers.-
dc.language.isoEnglish-
dc.titleFeatures that make spirometers user-friendly for primary care practice-
dc.typeConference Abstract-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/resp.14458-
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L641144949&from=export-
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/resp.14458-
dc.identifier.journaltitleRespirology-
dc.identifier.risid4654-
dc.description.pages17-
dc.description.volume28-
item.languageiso639-1English-
item.openairetypeConference Abstract-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

12
checked on Nov 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.