Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/5845
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Margaret, M. E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Irene, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Johanna, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leanne, R. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-20T00:27:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-20T00:27:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Respirology, 2023 (28) p.17 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/5845 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Many spirometers used in primary care have inflexible software and graphics displays that are not user-friendly for achieving quality spirometry to international standards. Guidelines exist for spirometer technical features, and spirometry test quality and reports, 1,2 but there are no guides that identify user-friendly features for spirometers. Aim: To use expert opinion to develop a comprehensive list of user-friendly features for spirometers used in primary care. Method: Experts with suitable experience in spirometry were recruited from relevant networks; Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science, Queensland State-wide Clinical Networks, National Asthma Council and Primary Health Networks. Modified Delphi Consensus methodology 3 was used. The importance of 92 possible features (from 10 categories) were rated by experts using a 6-point Likert Scale; essential, very important, moderately important, low importance, not at all important or no opinion. Ethics waiver (EX/21/QCHQ/77717) was gained. Results: Thirty-six experts completed 2 rounds of the survey. We identified 67 features from the 10 categories where ≥75% of experts gave a rating of either 'essential' or 'very important'. This consensus threshold was considered a priori as a strong expert recommendation for a feature. Category Number of features where >75% experts scored essential or very important 1. General details 3 2. Calibration and biological controls 8 3. Infection control 4 4. Patient data 3 5. Data acquisition and display during testing session 16 6. Interpretation 6 7. Reports 13 8. Software downloads, technical support & user manual 4 9. Assessment of quality of trials 5 10. Other features and comments 5 Total 67 Conclusion: Australia-wide expert opinion has been used to develop a comprehensive list of features that make spirometers user-friendly for achieving quality spirometry in primary care. The list provides a valuable evidence-based resource for health workers and managers in primary and community care when purchasing a spirometer to achieve quality testing and also for manufacturers seeking to improve their spirometers. | - |
dc.language.iso | English | - |
dc.title | Features that make spirometers user-friendly for primary care practice | - |
dc.type | Conference Abstract | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/resp.14458 | - |
dc.relation.url | https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L641144949&from=export | - |
dc.relation.url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/resp.14458 | - |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Respirology | - |
dc.identifier.risid | 4654 | - |
dc.description.pages | 17 | - |
dc.description.volume | 28 | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | English | - |
item.openairetype | Conference Abstract | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications |
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.