Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/5833
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPurdy, Eve-
dc.contributor.authorSymon, Ben-
dc.contributor.authorMarks, Ruth-Ellen-
dc.contributor.authorSpeirs, Chris-
dc.contributor.authorBrazil, Victoria-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-20T00:27:51Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-20T00:27:51Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in simulation (London, England), 2023 (8) 1 p.11en
dc.identifier.urihttps://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/5833-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There have been increasing calls for awareness and action related to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in simulation but a lack of practical guidance for how simulation delivery teams (SDTs) might move towards meaningful transformation. The gap between academic conversations about EDI and how to practically impact SDT attitudes, behaviors, and performance remains considerable. We designed a conversational tool, the SIM-EDI, to bridge the gap between theory and practice for SDTs by enhancing reflexivity and studied its impact locally.; Methods: We engaged in a collaborative autoethnography to explore EDI within our emergency department SDT shortly after implementing the SIM-EDI. The 12-month ethnography is informed by our team's collection and analysis of data about ourselves and our own experiences using the tool. Data included serial interviews, field notes from simulations and SDT meetings, SDT documents, and self-reflections.; Results: We found the SIM-EDI tool could be implemented with a team with a high level of readiness. Use of the tool had several meaningful impacts including enhanced team reflexivity, normalization of conversations related to EDI and increased confidence to engage in EDI conversations with participants. Key themes throughout the process included (1) individual and team growth, (2) fear of "getting it wrong", and (3) tension between bias towards action and need for slow reflection.; Conclusion: The SIM-EDI tool can effectively promote reflexivity among faculty in an emergency department simulation program. The tool is easy to use and implement, impacts attitudes and behaviors, and facilitates individual and team growth. (© 2023. The Author(s).)-
dc.titleExploring equity, diversity, and inclusion in a simulation program using the SIM-EDI tool: the impact of a reflexive tool for simulation educators-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s41077-023-00250-7-
dc.relation.urlhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,athens&db=mdc&AN=37004091&site=ehost-live-
dc.identifier.journaltitleAdvances in simulation (London, England)-
dc.identifier.risid4361-
dc.description.pages11-
dc.description.volume8-
dc.description.issue1-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on Nov 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.