Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/5475
Title: Conservative Versus Surgical Management of Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review
Authors: Chin, Xinlin
Mallika Arachchige, Sachini
Orbell-Smith, Jane L
Da Rocha, Daniela 
Gandhi, Anil
Issue Date: 2024
Source: Chin X, Mallika Arachchige S, Orbell-Smith JL, Da Rocha D, Gandhi A. Conservative Versus Surgical Management of Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024 Jan 21;16(1):e52697. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52697. PMID: 38384640; PMCID: PMC10879736.
Journal: Cureus
Abstract: Recent studies have discussed the role of antibiotic treatment in the conservative management of acute appendicitis and whether antibiotics are a safe option to replace appendicectomy, which has been the gold standard treatment of acute appendicitis for many years. The bibliographic databases Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and PubMed comparing conservative versus surgical treatment of acute appendicitis were systematically searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Twenty-one studies consisting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses involving 44,699 participants were identified. At least 17,865 participants were treated with antibiotics. Our studies compare antibiotic versus appendicectomy among acute appendicitis patients ranging from 7 to 94 years of age. In most studies, patients received parenteral antibiotics for a total of one to three days, and oral antibiotics such as oral cephalosporin plus metronidazole, oral amoxicillin/clavulanate, oral fluoroquinolones plus Tinidazole upon hospital discharge for a total of 7 to 10 days. The total course of antibiotics for both parenteral and oral regimes ranged from 2 to 16 days, with 10 days being the commonest duration. The recurrence rate following initial antibiotic treatment at one-year follow-up ranged from 13% to 38%, while the mean duration of recurrence ranged from three to eight months. The majority of the patients with recurrence underwent appendicectomy, while some patients were either given a repeat or different course of antibiotics due to the possible presence of antibiotic resistance; however, only 2.4% of the patients were successfully treated upon completion of the second course of antibiotics. Most of the studies concluded that appendicectomy remains the gold standard treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis, given its higher efficacy and lower complication rates. Although antibiotic treatment cannot be routinely recommended, it can be considered an appropriate alternative in selected patients with uncomplicated appendicitis who wish to avoid surgery and also acknowledge the risk of recurrence and the potential need for subsequent surgery at the same time.
Description: Cairns & Hinterland Hospital and Health Service (CHHHS) affiliated author: Daniela Da Rocha
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52697
Keywords: acute appendicitis;antibiotics;appendicectomy;conservative treatment;systematic review;uncomplicated acute appendicitis
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Cairns & Hinterland HHS Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Conservative versus surgical management of acute appendicitis.pdf303.93 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

164
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Download(s)

60
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.