Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/5399
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeldrum, Kathrynen
dc.contributor.authorAndersson, Ellainaen
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Valdaen
dc.contributor.authorWebb, Torresen
dc.contributor.authorQuigley, Rachelen
dc.contributor.authorStrivens, Edwarden
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Sarahen
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-24T03:32:07Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-24T03:32:07Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationMeldrum K, Andersson E, Wallace V, Webb T, Quigley R, Strivens E, Russell S. Approaches to the development of new screening tools that assess distress in Indigenous peoples: A systematic mixed studies review. PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0291141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291141. PMID: 37682832; PMCID: PMC10490875.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/5399-
dc.descriptionCairns & Hinterland Hospital and Health Service (CHHHS) affiliated author: Edward Strivensen
dc.description.abstractThis mixed studies review assessed the extent of the literature related to approaches used to develop new tools that screen for distress in Indigenous adults globally. It answered the research question: What qualitative and quantitative approaches are used to develop new screening tools that assess distress in Indigenous peoples globally? CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, Medline, PsychInfo and Scopus databases were systematically searched to identify relevant articles published between January 2000 and February 2023. Articles describing the development of a new screening tool for Indigenous peoples, globally, published in English since 2000 and constituted a full publication of primary research, met the inclusion criteria. Studies underwent quality appraisal using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. A sequential exploratory design guided data analysis. Synthesis occurred using a two-phase sequential method. Nineteen articles constituted the data set. Articles described the use of qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods in approximately equal numbers. Overall, qualitative methods were used in early stages of tool development, with mixed and quantitative methods used to pilot and validate them. However, most studies did not follow the theoretical guidelines for tool development, and while validation studies took place in over half of the data set, none adequately assessed construct validity. Sixty percent of the articles were located using citation searches, which suggests database searches were ineffective. Valid tools that screen for distress in Indigenous populations support equitable access to health care. This review found that most screening tools were developed in Australia. However, additional evidence of their validity is needed in addition to a valid diagnostic tool that supports the determination of criterion validity. These needs present important future research opportunities.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe first author is supported by an Ian Potter Foundation Grant number 31110728. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofPloS oneen
dc.subjectAustraliaen
dc.subjectCross-cultural studiesen
dc.subjectDatabase searchingen
dc.subjectDepressionen
dc.subjectQualitative studiesen
dc.subjectHealth screeningen
dc.subjectMeasurementen
dc.subjectMental health and psychiatryen
dc.titleApproaches to the development of new screening tools that assess distress in Indigenous peoples: A systematic mixed studies reviewen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0291141-
dc.identifier.pmid37682832-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Sites:Cairns & Hinterland HHS Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

78
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Download(s)

24
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.