Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4507
Title: | Routine Catheter Lock Solutions in Pediatric Cancer Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Heparin vs Saline | Authors: | Ullman, Amanda Byrnes, J. Keogh, S. Kleidon, T Paterson, R. S. Cattanach, P. Gibson, V. Takashima, M. Bradford, N. Cooke, M. Rickard, C. M. Paton, A. Roy, J. Walker, R. Edwards, R. |
Issue Date: | 2022 | Source: | , 2022 | Journal: | Cancer nursing | Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Central venous access devices (CVADs) are integral to cancer care provision. Despite the high prevalence of CVAD complications in children with cancer, preventative strategies are understudied. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess study feasibility, occlusive events, thrombolytic use, adverse events, and direct costs of catheter lock solutions. METHODS: A single-center, parallel-group, pilot randomized controlled trial was undertaken at a tertiary-referral pediatric hospital in Australia. Children 18 years or younger with an oncological or malignant hematological condition and a CVAD were eligible. Participants were 1:1 randomized to (1) normal or (2) heparinized (10-100 U/mL; CVAD-type dependent) saline lock solutions. RESULTS: Of 217 children assessed for eligibility, 61 were recruited and randomized to normal (n = 30; 3850 CVAD days) or heparinized (n = 31; 4036 CVAD days) saline. Eligibility (52%) and recruitment (54%) feasibility targets were not met. Protocol adherence was high (95% assessments), with no attrition. Parent/clinician satisfaction of interventions was high (median, 10/10 clinicians/parents). Complete CVAD occlusion occurred in heparin only (n = 2, 6.7% CVADs; incidence rate [IR], 0.49/1000 CVAD days [0.06-1.78]). Central venous access device partial occlusion was detected in 23.3% of CVADs in heparin (n = 7; IR, 2.73/1000 CVAD days [1.36-4.87]) and 13.8% of CVADs in normal saline (n = 4; IR, 2.59/1000 CVAD days [1.24-4.77]). Thrombolytic agents were used in 16.7% heparin (5 CVADs) and 3.5% normal saline (1 CVAD). Adverse events did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Multisite randomized controlled trials examining CVAD locks are safe, but strategies and resources to increase recruitment and eligibility are required. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Both routine CVAD lock solutions seem safe but may not prevent all forms of CVAD-associated harm.L6372028832022-02-15 | DOI: | 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001053 | Resources: | https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L637202883&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001053 | | Keywords: | catheter;articleAustralia;feasibility study;female;human;human experiment;incidence;major clinical study;male;malignant neoplasm;multicenter study;occlusion;child;patient referral;pediatric hospital;protocol compliance;randomized controlled trial;satisfaction;fibrinolytic agent;heparin;sodium chloride;eligibility;parallel design;clinical assessment;clinical trial;controlled study | Type: | Article |
Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.