Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4507
Title: Routine Catheter Lock Solutions in Pediatric Cancer Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Heparin vs Saline
Authors: Ullman, Amanda 
Byrnes, J.
Keogh, S.
Kleidon, T 
Paterson, R. S.
Cattanach, P.
Gibson, V.
Takashima, M.
Bradford, N.
Cooke, M.
Rickard, C. M.
Paton, A.
Roy, J.
Walker, R.
Edwards, R.
Issue Date: 2022
Source: , 2022
Journal: Cancer nursing
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Central venous access devices (CVADs) are integral to cancer care provision. Despite the high prevalence of CVAD complications in children with cancer, preventative strategies are understudied. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess study feasibility, occlusive events, thrombolytic use, adverse events, and direct costs of catheter lock solutions. METHODS: A single-center, parallel-group, pilot randomized controlled trial was undertaken at a tertiary-referral pediatric hospital in Australia. Children 18 years or younger with an oncological or malignant hematological condition and a CVAD were eligible. Participants were 1:1 randomized to (1) normal or (2) heparinized (10-100 U/mL; CVAD-type dependent) saline lock solutions. RESULTS: Of 217 children assessed for eligibility, 61 were recruited and randomized to normal (n = 30; 3850 CVAD days) or heparinized (n = 31; 4036 CVAD days) saline. Eligibility (52%) and recruitment (54%) feasibility targets were not met. Protocol adherence was high (95% assessments), with no attrition. Parent/clinician satisfaction of interventions was high (median, 10/10 clinicians/parents). Complete CVAD occlusion occurred in heparin only (n = 2, 6.7% CVADs; incidence rate [IR], 0.49/1000 CVAD days [0.06-1.78]). Central venous access device partial occlusion was detected in 23.3% of CVADs in heparin (n = 7; IR, 2.73/1000 CVAD days [1.36-4.87]) and 13.8% of CVADs in normal saline (n = 4; IR, 2.59/1000 CVAD days [1.24-4.77]). Thrombolytic agents were used in 16.7% heparin (5 CVADs) and 3.5% normal saline (1 CVAD). Adverse events did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Multisite randomized controlled trials examining CVAD locks are safe, but strategies and resources to increase recruitment and eligibility are required. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Both routine CVAD lock solutions seem safe but may not prevent all forms of CVAD-associated harm.L6372028832022-02-15
DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001053
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L637202883&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001053 |
Keywords: catheter;articleAustralia;feasibility study;female;human;human experiment;incidence;major clinical study;male;malignant neoplasm;multicenter study;occlusion;child;patient referral;pediatric hospital;protocol compliance;randomized controlled trial;satisfaction;fibrinolytic agent;heparin;sodium chloride;eligibility;parallel design;clinical assessment;clinical trial;controlled study
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

76
checked on Mar 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.