Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4491
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRickard, C. M.en
dc.contributor.authorUllman, Amandaen
dc.contributor.authorCooke, M.en
dc.contributor.authorKleidon, Ten
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:53:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:53:19Z-
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citation53, (2), 2017, p. 123-130en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4491-
dc.description.abstractAim: To identify the prevalence, management and complications associated with central venous access devices (CVADs) within Australian paediatric facilities, providing a map for clinicians, researchers and managers to focus solutions. Methods: A point prevalence audit and survey of CVAD practices in Australian tertiary paediatric hospitals between September and November 2015, using validated data collection tools. Results: Across the six sites, 1027 patients were screened with CVADs prevalent in 26.1% (n = 268), and 261 CVADs in 248 patients available for audit. Variations in management were evident with dressings not meeting the basic criteria of clean, dry and intact for 13.5% of CVADs (n = 35), and non-sterile dressings used to reinforce 26.4% of CVADs (n = 69). Almost half of CVADs (49.4%; n = 132) had no documentation regarding site assessment in the previous 4 h, and 13.4% had no planned use in the next 24 h (35 CVAD). CVAD-associated complications within the previous 7 days were evident in 9.5% of CVADs (n = 27), most commonly catheter blockage (5.7% CVAD, n = 15), and bloodstream infection (1.9% CVAD, n = 5). Peripherally inserted central catheters (16.9%) in comparison to other catheter types (7.4%; P = 0.04), and subsequent CVADs (14.1%) in comparison to initial CVADs (6.5%; P = 0.04), had significantly higher proportions of CVAD-associated complications in the previous 7 days. Variation between the sites’ guidelines was evident across many practices. Conclusions: CVADs are prevalent and essential for paediatric health care; however, complications remain a significant problem. Areas identified for improvement were local CVAD guidelines, regular documentation of CVAD site assessment and review of dressing products to improve integrity.L6132957382016-11-24 <br />2017-03-14 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Paediatrics and Child Healthen
dc.titleRoad map for improvement: Point prevalence audit and survey of central venous access devices in paediatric acute careen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jpc.13347en
dc.subject.keywordshealth care qualityen
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.subject.keywordsinjection site contusionen
dc.subject.keywordsinjection site erythemaen
dc.subject.keywordsinjection site infectionen
dc.subject.keywordsinjection site painen
dc.subject.keywordsinjection site reactionen
dc.subject.keywordsinterrater reliabilityen
dc.subject.keywordsmajor clinical studyen
dc.subject.keywordsmaleen
dc.subject.keywordsmanageren
dc.subject.keywordsmedical device complicationen
dc.subject.keywordsmedical documentationen
dc.subject.keywordspatient careen
dc.subject.keywordspediatric hospitalen
dc.subject.keywordspediatricsen
dc.subject.keywordsphysicianen
dc.subject.keywordspoint prevalence auditen
dc.subject.keywordspractice guidelineen
dc.subject.keywordspreschool childen
dc.subject.keywordsprevalenceen
dc.subject.keywordsrashen
dc.subject.keywordsschool childen
dc.subject.keywordsscientisten
dc.subject.keywordsskin injuryen
dc.subject.keywordstertiary care centeren
dc.subject.keywordsthrombosisen
dc.subject.keywordswound dressingen
dc.subject.keywordscentral venous catheterperipherally inserted central venous catheteren
dc.subject.keywordsarticleen
dc.subject.keywordsAustriaen
dc.subject.keywordsbloodstream infectionen
dc.subject.keywordscatheter blockageen
dc.subject.keywordscatheter dislodgementen
dc.subject.keywordschilden
dc.subject.keywordschild careen
dc.subject.keywordsclinical auditen
dc.subject.keywordsclinical practiceen
dc.subject.keywordscontrolled studyen
dc.subject.keywordsemergency careen
dc.subject.keywordsevidence based practiceen
dc.subject.keywordsextravasationen
dc.subject.keywordsfeasibility studyen
dc.subject.keywordsfemaleen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L613295738&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13347 |en
dc.identifier.risid620en
dc.description.pages123-130en
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

74
checked on Feb 12, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.