Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4426
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, L.en
dc.contributor.authorThomas, N.en
dc.contributor.authorTan, J. L.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:52:41Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:52:41Z-
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.citation58 , 2016, p. 51-52en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4426-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Manual muscle testing (MMT) is used to monitor muscle strength/weakness and associated neurological status of children with spina bifida.(1) For this to be clinically valid, a standardized and reliable protocol for children with spina bifida is critical. The Daniels and Worthingham (D&W) MMT protocol(2) has been recommended by the International Myelodysplasia Study Group(3) due to its detailed methodological information. However, the D&W Protocol was developed for adults, and its reliability has not been established for children. This study aims to examine the inter-rater reliability of the D&W MMT protocol for children with spina bifida. Design: Cross-sectional study. Method: Thirteen children with Spina Bifida (2 males) aged 6 to 18 years (mean 12y 6mo, SD 2y 9mo) were recruited from a Spina Bifida service in a state-wide tertiary children's hospital. Each child had strength of 19 lower limb muscles examined bilaterally using the D&W MMT protocol by one experienced and one novice physiotherapist. Examiner and limb order was counterbalanced. Fidelity was enhanced by (1) recreation of the D&W photo guide for each MMT test for each muscle with a child model; (2) development of a standardized recording form, (3) examiner training with children not in the study until agreement was reached on technique and scoring. Analysis of agreement between examiners was performed using quadratic weighted kappa (jw2), percent exact agreement (%EA) and Bland-Altmann limits of agreement (LoA). Minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated to determine minimum change required to detect real clinical deterioration. Results: The D&W MMT protocol shows excellent inter-rater agreement (jw2=0.950; 95% CI: 0.935-0.962); good exact agreement (72.29%); and clinically appropriate limits of agreement (-1.302 to 1.402) when results of experienced versus novice raters are compared. The MDC was 1.11 points, indicating a change of 2-points is required to detect clinical change on the 6-point scale. Conclusion: The D&W MMT protocol, when used after standard training and with standard prompt sheet and recording sheet, is reliable for use with children with Spina Bifida.L6148362972017-03-21 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurologyen
dc.titleReproducibility and clinical utility of manual muscle testing (MMT) for children with Spina Bifidaen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/dmcn.13069en
dc.subject.keywordsfemaleen
dc.subject.keywordshospitalen
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.subject.keywordsinterrater reliabilityen
dc.subject.keywordsleg muscleen
dc.subject.keywordsmaleen
dc.subject.keywordsmodelen
dc.subject.keywordsmuscle trainingen
dc.subject.keywordschilden
dc.subject.keywordsrecreationen
dc.subject.keywordsreproducibilityen
dc.subject.keywordsspinal dysraphismen
dc.subject.keywordsadolescentadulten
dc.subject.keywordsphysiotherapisten
dc.subject.keywordsclinical articleen
dc.subject.keywordscross-sectional studyen
dc.subject.keywordsdeteriorationen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L614836297&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13069 |en
dc.identifier.risid1467en
dc.description.pages51-52en
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

52
checked on Feb 12, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.