Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4178
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuth, S. F.en
dc.contributor.authorBarlow, Karenen
dc.contributor.authorWaak, M.en
dc.contributor.authorSlater, A.en
dc.contributor.authorRaman, S.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:50:07Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:50:07Z-
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.citation37, (20), 2020, p. 2141-2149en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4178-
dc.description.abstractPredictive modeling is foundational to treatment and long-term management of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Assessment of injury severity in the acute-care setting enables early stratification of patients based on their risk of death, lifelong disability, or unfavorable outcome. This review evaluates predictive models that have been developed or validated for pediatric TBI patients. The predictive accuracy of these models, the outcomes and time points predicted, and the variables and statistical methods utilized in model development were compared. Embase, Scopus, MEDLINE®, and Web of Science were searched for studies that developed statistical models for predicting patient outcomes following pediatric TBI. Studies were excluded if they focused on adults or non-traumatic brain injury, or if they did not assess classification accuracy. A total of 4538 entries were identified and screened, with 7 studies included for analysis. This included five studies in which adult predictive models were validated for use in the pediatric setting, and two in which new models were derived from a pediatric cohort. Trials of adult prediction tools in pediatric cohorts, including the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury (CRASH)-TBI models, showed comparable accuracy between classification of adults and children. Models derived from pediatric cohorts showed improved accuracy. Most studies solely focused on clinical variables, with two studies incorporating biochemical and imaging variables. Predictive models for pediatric TBI are primarily based on methods and variables identified in adult studies. Although adult models have proven effective in select pediatric cohorts, they may be suboptimal when compared with models derived or adjusted for children.L6332101622020-10-29 <br />2020-11-11 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Neurotraumaen
dc.titlePredicting Neurological Recovery after Traumatic Brain Injury in Children: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Modelsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/neu.2020.7158en
dc.subject.keywordsmathematical modelen
dc.subject.keywordsmortality rateen
dc.subject.keywordspredictionen
dc.subject.keywordspredictive valueen
dc.subject.keywordsprognosisen
dc.subject.keywordsreviewen
dc.subject.keywordsbiochemical analysisen
dc.subject.keywordstraumatic brain injuryen
dc.subject.keywordstreatment outcomeen
dc.subject.keywordsagingartificial intelligenceen
dc.subject.keywordssystematic reviewen
dc.subject.keywordscomparative studyen
dc.subject.keywordsdiagnostic accuracyen
dc.subject.keywordsdisease classificationen
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L633210162&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2020.7158 |en
dc.identifier.risid2181en
dc.description.pages2141-2149en
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

64
checked on Feb 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.