Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4075
Title: Peripherally Inserted Central catheter iNnovation to reduce Infections and Clots (the PICNIC trial): A randomised controlled trial protocol
Authors: Ullman, Amanda 
Kleidon, T 
Walker, R.
Marsh, N. M.
Bulmer, A.
Pearch, B.
Runnegar, N.
Schults, J. A.
Leema, J.
Lee-Archer, P.
Biles, C.
Southam, K.
Gibson, V.
Byrnes, J.
Ware, R. S.
Chopra, V.
Coulthard, A.
Mollee, P.
Rickard, C. M.
Harris, P. N. A.
August, D.
Issue Date: 2021
Source: 11, (4), 2021
Journal: BMJ Open
Abstract: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are vital for the delivery of medical therapies, but up to 30% of PICCs are associated with complications such as deep vein thrombosis or infection. The integration of antimicrobial and hydrophobic catheter materials, and pressure-activated valves, into polyurethane PICCs are innovations designed to prevent infective and/or thrombotic complications. A multicentre, parallel group, superiority randomised controlled trial with two experimental arms ((1) hydrophobic PICC (with pressure-activated valve); (2) chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated PICC (with external clamp)) and one control group ((3) conventional polyurethane PICC (with external clamp)). Recruitment of 1098 adult and paediatric patients will take place over 2 years at three tertiary-referral hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Patients are eligible for inclusion if their PICC is to be inserted for medical treatment, with a vascular size sufficient to support a 4-Fr PICC or larger, and with informed consent. The primary outcome isPICC failure, a composite of thrombotic (venous thrombosis, breakage and occlusion) and infective complications (PICC-associated bloodstream infection and local infection). Secondary outcomes include: all-cause PICC complication; thrombotic complications; infective complications; adverse events (local or systemic reaction); PICC dwell time; patient/parent satisfaction; and healthcare costs. Differences between both intervention groups and the control group will be compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. Effect estimates will be presented as HRs with corresponding 95% CI. Ethical approval from Queensland Health (HREC/QCHQ/48682) and Griffith University (Ref. No. 2019/094). Results will be published. ACTRN12619000022167.L6347683252021-04-23
2021-05-07
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042475
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L634768325&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042475 |
Keywords: tertiary care center;ACTRN12619000022167peripherally inserted central venous catheter;chlorhexidine gluconate;polyurethan;adolescent;adult;allergy;bloodstream infection;catheter infection;catheter occlusion;child;clinical effectiveness;clinical trial protocol;controlled study;cost effectiveness analysis;device safety;dwell time;health care cost;human;hydrophobicity;major clinical study;medical device complication;multicenter study;note;pain;parallel design;parental attitude;patient satisfaction;Queensland;randomized controlled trial;satisfaction;superiority trial;vein thrombosis
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Queensland Health Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

104
checked on May 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.