Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3828
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLong, D. A.en
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, M. L.en
dc.contributor.authorWare, R. S.en
dc.contributor.authorSchibler, A.en
dc.contributor.authorSchults, J. A.en
dc.contributor.authorCooke, M.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:46:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:46:34Z-
dc.date.issued2018en
dc.identifier.citation8, (1), 2018en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3828-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Endotracheal suction (ETS) is a frequent and necessary airway intervention for the intubated child. The aim of ETS is to clear the endotracheal tube and airways of respiratory secretions; however, the methods of performing ETS are varied. Internationally a number of ETS treatments are in use. Many have not been rigorously evaluated in a randomised controlled trial setting, and it is uncertain whether any are associated with better outcomes for the critically ill child. With approximately 50% of paediatric intensive care admissions requiring intubation, ETS interventions that maximise the efficacy and minimise the complications of ETS could translate to improved health for substantial numbers of critically ill children, and significant cost savings. The primary aim of the study is to examine two ETS interventions, normal saline instillation and lung recruitment, to determine if it is feasible to conduct a full efficacy trial. Methods and analysis NARES (Normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation And lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction) is a single-centre, pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial conducted in a tertiary referral paediatric centre in Brisbane, Australia. Children (aged 0-16 years) are eligible if they are intubated with an endotracheal tube and mechanically ventilated. Two intervention pairs will be compared using a 2×2 factorial design: (1) normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation; and (2) lung recruitment versus no lung recruitment. The primary outcome is study feasibility measured by a composite analysis of eligibility, recruitment, retention, protocol adherence and missing data. Secondary outcomes are ventilator-associated pneumonia, SpO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, lung compliance, end expiratory level and regional tidal volume. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval to conduct the research has been obtained. Dissemination of the research findings will be untaken, guided by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement recommendations. Protocol content was guided by the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2013 statement. Trial registration number ACTRN12617000609358; Pre-results.L6237945902018-09-17 <br />2018-09-19 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Openen
dc.titleNormal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation and lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction: The NARES trial. A study protocol for a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trialen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019789en
dc.subject.keywordspatient monitoren
dc.subject.keywordsmechanical ventilatoren
dc.subject.keywordsadolescenten
dc.subject.keywordsadulten
dc.subject.keywordsarterial oxygen saturationen
dc.subject.keywordsarticleen
dc.subject.keywordsartificial ventilationen
dc.subject.keywordsbreathing rateen
dc.subject.keywordsclinical outcomeen
dc.subject.keywordscomparative studyen
dc.subject.keywordsconservative treatmenten
dc.subject.keywordscontrolled studyen
dc.subject.keywordsdrug instillationen
dc.subject.keywordsendotracheal intubationen
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.subject.keywordsinfanten
dc.subject.keywordslung complianceen
dc.subject.keywordssodium chlorideen
dc.subject.keywordslung volumeen
dc.subject.keywordsmajor clinical studyen
dc.subject.keywordsnewbornen
dc.subject.keywordspilot studyen
dc.subject.keywordspositive end expiratory pressure ventilationen
dc.subject.keywordsprotocol complianceen
dc.subject.keywordsrandomized controlled trialen
dc.subject.keywordstidal volumeen
dc.subject.keywordstracheobronchial toileten
dc.subject.keywordsventilator associated pneumoniaen
dc.subject.keywordsBellavista 1000en
dc.subject.keywordsIntelliVueen
dc.subject.keywordsendotracheal tubeen
dc.subject.keywordsACTRN12617000609358continuous ventilatoren
dc.subject.keywordslung recruitmenten
dc.subject.keywordsSERVO U/Ien
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L623794590&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019789 |en
dc.identifier.risid254en
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Queensland Health Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

146
checked on Dec 11, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.