Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2890
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarty, Christopheren
dc.contributor.authorModenese, L.en
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, R. N.en
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, D. G.en
dc.contributor.authorKainz, H.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:36:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:36:18Z-
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citation30, (4), 2015, p. 319-329en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2890-
dc.description.abstractBackground Inaccuracies in locating the three-dimensional position of the hip joint centre affect the calculated hip and knee kinematics, force- and moment-generating capacity of muscles and hip joint mechanics, which can lead to incorrect interpretations and recommendations in gait analysis. Several functional and predictive methods have been developed to estimate the hip joint centre location, and the International Society of Biomechanics recommends a functional approach for use with participants that have adequate range of motion at the hip, and predictive methods in those with insufficient range of motion. The purpose of the current systematic review was to substantiate the International Society of Biomechanics recommendations. This included identifying the most accurate functional and predictive methods, and defining 'adequate' range of motion. Methods A systematic search with broad search terms was performed including five databases. Findings The systematic search yielded to 801 articles, of which 34 papers were included. Eleven different predictive and 13 different functional methods were identified. The results showed that the geometric sphere fit method and Harrington equations are the most accurate functional and predictive approaches respectively that have been evaluated in vivo. Interpretation In regard to the International Society of Biomechanics recommendations, the geometric sphere fit method should be used in people with sufficient active hip range of motion and the Harrington equations should be used in patients without sufficient hip range of motion. Multi-plane movement trials with at least 60° of flexion-extension and 30° of ab-adduction range of motion are suggested when using functional methods.L6032421022015-03-27 <br />2015-05-06 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Biomechanicsen
dc.titleEstimation of the hip joint centre in human motion analysis: A systematic reviewen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.005en
dc.subject.keywordssample sizeen
dc.subject.keywordssystematic reviewen
dc.subject.keywordsX rayen
dc.subject.keywordsreviewen
dc.subject.keywordsabductionaccuracyen
dc.subject.keywordsadductionen
dc.subject.keywordsbody massen
dc.subject.keywordscomputer assisted tomographyen
dc.subject.keywordsgold standarden
dc.subject.keywordshipen
dc.subject.keywordship joint centeren
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.subject.keywordsjoint mobilizationen
dc.subject.keywordsmusculoskeletal system parametersen
dc.subject.keywordsnonhumanen
dc.subject.keywordsnuclear magnetic resonance imagingen
dc.subject.keywordspelvisen
dc.subject.keywordspriority journalen
dc.subject.keywordsquality controlen
dc.subject.keywordsrange of motionen
dc.subject.keywordsreliabilityen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L603242102&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.005 |en
dc.identifier.risid2111en
dc.description.pages319-329en
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Queensland Health Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

114
checked on May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.