Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2609
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, B. J.en
dc.contributor.authorLong, D. A.en
dc.contributor.authorShehabi, Y.en
dc.contributor.authorStraney, L.en
dc.contributor.authorFesta, M. S.en
dc.contributor.authorErickson, S. J.en
dc.contributor.authorMillar, J.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:33:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:33:18Z-
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.citation, 2020, p. E731-E739en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2609-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a sedation protocol using dexmedetomidine as the primary sedative in mechanically ventilated critically ill children. Design: Open-label, pilot, prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. The primary outcome was the proportion of sedation scores in the target sedation range in the first 48 hours. Safety outcomes included device removal, adverse events, and vasopressor use. Feasibility outcomes included time to randomization and protocol fidelity. Setting: Six tertiary PICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Patients: Critically ill children, younger than 16 years old, requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation and expected to be mechanically ventilated for at least 24 hours. Interventions: Children randomized to dexmedetomidine received a dexmedetomidine-based algorithm targeted to light sedation (State Behavioral Scale -1 to +1). Children randomized to usual care received sedation as determined by the treating clinician (but not dexmedetomidine), also targeted to light sedation. Measurements and Main Results: Sedation with dexmedetomidine as the primary sedative resulted in a greater proportion of sedation measurements in the light sedation range (State Behavioral Scale -1 to +1) over the first 48 hours (229/325 [71%] vs 181/331 [58%]; p = 0.04) and the first 24 hours (66/103 [64%] vs 48/116 [41%]; p < 0.001) compared with usual care. Cumulative midazolam dosage was significantly reduced in the dexmedetomidine arm compared with usual care (p = 0.002).There were more episodes of hypotension and bradycardia with dexmedetomidine (including one serious adverse event) but no difference in vasopressor requirements. Median time to randomization after intubation was 6.0 hours (interquartile range, 2.0-9.0 hr) in the dexmedetomidine arm compared with 3.0 hours (interquartile range, 1.0-7.0 hr) in the usual care arm (p = 0.24). Conclusions: A sedation protocol using dexmedetomidine as the primary sedative was feasible, appeared safe, achieved early, light sedation, and reduced midazolam requirements. The findings of this pilot study justify further studies of sedative agents in critically ill children.L6329395802020-09-29 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofPediatric Critical Care Medicineen
dc.titleDexmedetomidine sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill children: A pilot randomized controlled trialen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PCC.0000000000002483en
dc.subject.keywordsmulticenter studyen
dc.subject.keywordspharmacokineticsen
dc.subject.keywordspilot studyen
dc.subject.keywordsprospective studyen
dc.subject.keywordsrandomizationen
dc.subject.keywordsrandomized controlled trialen
dc.subject.keywordssedationen
dc.subject.keywordsdexmedetomidineen
dc.subject.keywordshypertensive factoren
dc.subject.keywordsmidazolamen
dc.subject.keywordssedative agenten
dc.subject.keywordsside effecten
dc.subject.keywordsadverse drug reactionalgorithmen
dc.subject.keywordsarticleen
dc.subject.keywordsartificial ventilationen
dc.subject.keywordsAustralia and New Zealanden
dc.subject.keywordsbradycardiaen
dc.subject.keywordschilden
dc.subject.keywordsclinical trialen
dc.subject.keywordscontrolled studyen
dc.subject.keywordscritical illnessen
dc.subject.keywordscritically ill patienten
dc.subject.keywordsdevice removalen
dc.subject.keywordsdrug safetyen
dc.subject.keywordsdrug therapyen
dc.subject.keywordsfeasibility studyen
dc.subject.keywordsfemaleen
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.subject.keywordshypotensionen
dc.subject.keywordsintubationen
dc.subject.keywordsmaleen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L632939580&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002483 |en
dc.identifier.risid2617en
dc.description.pagesE731-E739en
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Queensland Health Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.