Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2553
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHorn, P.en
dc.contributor.authorBeswick, R.en
dc.contributor.authorFitzgibbons, J.en
dc.contributor.authorDriscoll, C.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:32:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:32:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.citation64, (9), 2021, p. 3594-3602en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2553-
dc.description.abstractPurpose The current Joint Committee on Infant Hearing guidelines recommend that infants with syndromes or craniofacial abnormalities (CFAs) who pass the universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) undergo audiological assessment by 9 months of age. However, emerging research suggests that children with these risk factors are at increased risk of early hearing loss despite passing UNHS. To establish whether earlier diagnostic audiological assessment is warranted for all infants with a syndrome or CFA, regardless of screening outcome, this study compared audiological outcomes of those who passed UNHS and those who referred. Method A retrospective analysis was performed on infants with a syndrome or CFA born between July 1, 2012, and June 30, 2017 who participated in Queensland, Australia's state-wide UNHS program. Results Permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL) yield was higher among infants who referred on newborn hearing screening (51.20%) than in those who passed. Nonetheless, 27.47% of infants who passed were subsequently diagnosed with hearing loss (4.45% PCHL, 23.02% transient conductive), but PCHL was generally milder in this cohort. After microtia/atresia, the most common PCHL etiologies were Trisomy 21, other syndromes, and cleft palate. Of the other syndromes, Pierre Robin sequence featured prominently among infants who passed the hearing screen and were subsequently diagnosed with PCHL, whereas there was a broader mix of other syndromes that caused PCHL in infants who referred on screening. Conclusion Children identified with a syndrome or CFA benefit from early diagnostic audiological assessment, regardless of their newborn hearing screening outcome.L6359240212021-09-13 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHRen
dc.titleDetecting Hearing Loss in Infants With a Syndrome or Craniofacial Abnormalities Following the Newborn Hearing Screenen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00699en
dc.subject.keywordsinfanten
dc.subject.keywordsnewbornen
dc.subject.keywordsnewborn screeningen
dc.subject.keywordsretrospective studyen
dc.subject.keywordshearing impairmenten
dc.subject.keywordschildcleft palateen
dc.subject.keywordshearing testen
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.subject.keywordshearingen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L635924021&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00699 |en
dc.identifier.risid1446en
dc.description.pages3594-3602en
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Queensland Health Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.