Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2304
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTwigg, S.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:30:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:30:08Z-
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.citation32, (3), 2020, p. 337-342en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2304-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores four different approaches and clarifies objectives for debriefing after a clinical event in the emergency department. Psychological debriefing aims to prevent or reduce symptoms of traumatic stress and normalize recovery. Psychological first aid helps team members provide each other with pragmatic social support. Debriefing for simulation-based education promotes learning by team members. Quality improvement approaches and after action reviews focus on systems improvement. RECENT FINDINGS: Qualitative studies have begun to explore interactions between clinical staff after a significant clinical event. Clearer descriptions and measurements of quality improvements and the effect of clinical event debriefing on patient outcomes are appearing. An increasing number of studies describe melded, scripted approaches to the hot debrief. SUMMARY: Clinical staff have consistently indicated they value debriefing after a significant clinical event. Differing objectives from different approaches have translated into a wide variety of methods and a lack of clarity about relevant outcomes to measure. Recent descriptions of scripted approaches may clarify these objectives and pave the way for measuring relevant outcomes that demonstrate the effectiveness of and find the place for debriefing in the emergency department.L6316350542020-05-06 <br />2021-01-08 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent opinion in pediatricsen
dc.titleClinical event debriefing: a review of approaches and objectivesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MOP.0000000000000890en
dc.subject.keywordsqualitative researchen
dc.subject.keywordstotal quality managementen
dc.subject.keywordsclinical competencefeedback systemen
dc.subject.keywordshospital emergency serviceen
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.subject.keywordslearningen
dc.subject.keywordsmedical erroren
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L631635054&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000890 |en
dc.identifier.risid1232en
dc.description.pages337-342en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Apr 24, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.