Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/1812
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKimble, R. M.en
dc.contributor.authorOakley, E.en
dc.contributor.authorFrear, C.en
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, Bronwynen
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:24:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:24:31Z-
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.citation76, (4), 2020, p. S19en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/1812-
dc.description.abstractStudy Objectives: Best-practice burns first aid in Australia is currently defined as 20 minutes of cool running water (CRW) within three hours of injury. This research aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with applying this intervention and how well it is adhered to by both civilians and health care professionals, from first responders through to tertiary hospital emergency clinicians. Methods: These cohort studies utilized a prospectively collected registry of patients managed at an Australian tertiary children’s hospital. Multivariate logistic and Cox regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between first aid and patient outcomes (eg, skin grafting requirements, time to re-epithelialization, wound depth, hospital admission, length of stay, and operating room interventions). Further descriptive and logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine differences in adequacy between the groups in age, ethnicity, location and socioeconomic status, among others. Results: In our patient outcome cohort, 1780/2495 (71.3%) received adequate first aid. These patients experienced decreased odds of skin grafting (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.8). Among ungrafted wounds, those cooled with any water were 1.3 (1.1-1.5) times more likely to achieve re-epithelialization per day post-injury. Healing times were significantly faster with adequate running water in burns requiring >9 days to re-epithelialize (HR 1.2, 1.0 to 1.3). Adequate first aid was further associated with reductions in full-thickness depth (OR 0.4, 0.2 to 0.6), hospital admission (OR 0.7, 0.5 to 0.9) and theater operations (OR 0.7, 0.5 to 0.9), but not hospital length of stay (HR 0.9, 0.7 to 1.2, p=0.48, Figure 1). Overall, 31.3% of children received adequate CRW from caregivers. Factors associated with caregiver inadequacy of CRW included very young age and early adolescence (p<0.001), rural location (P = 0.045), and low socioeconomic status (P = 0.030). Paramedics and general practitioners provided adequate cooling to 184/735 (25.0%) and 52/215 (24.2%) of their patients, respectively. Local general hospitals provided adequate CRW to 1019/1809 (56.3%) patients. Conclusion: Burn severity and clinical outcomes improves with the provision of cool running water, however deficiencies remain in the cooling of pediatric burns patients at all levels of initial management. Although adequate first aid delivery was poor across all demographics, it was significantly worse in children aged 0-2, adolescents aged 15-16, those living rurally, and the socioeconomically disadvantaged. There is a need in the health care community for improved education regarding the parameters and clinical benefits of cool running water first aid. [Formula presented]L20084098622020-11-03 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Emergency Medicineen
dc.title47 Cool Running Water First Aid for Pediatric Burns: Recommendation Adherence & Clinical Outcomes in a Series of Cohort and Cross-sectional Studiesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.09.057en
dc.subject.keywordsfemaleen
dc.subject.keywordsfirst aiden
dc.subject.keywordsfirst responder (person)en
dc.subject.keywordsgeneral practitioneren
dc.subject.keywordshospital admissionen
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.subject.keywordslength of stayen
dc.subject.keywordsmaleen
dc.subject.keywordsoperating roomen
dc.subject.keywordspreschool childen
dc.subject.keywordsprospective studyen
dc.subject.keywordsskin transplantationen
dc.subject.keywordssocial statusen
dc.subject.keywordstertiary care centeren
dc.subject.keywordsthicknessen
dc.subject.keywordsrunningen
dc.subject.keywordswateradolescenceen
dc.subject.keywordsadolescenten
dc.subject.keywordsburnen
dc.subject.keywordsburn patienten
dc.subject.keywordscaregiveren
dc.subject.keywordschilden
dc.subject.keywordsclinical outcomeen
dc.subject.keywordscohort analysisen
dc.subject.keywordsconference abstracten
dc.subject.keywordscontrolled studyen
dc.subject.keywordscoolingen
dc.subject.keywordscross-sectional studyen
dc.subject.keywordsdemographyen
dc.subject.keywordseducationen
dc.subject.keywordsepithelizationen
dc.subject.keywordsethnicityen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2008409862&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.09.057 |en
dc.identifier.risid1453en
dc.description.pagesS19en
local.message.claim2024-06-20T11:00:23.263+1000|||rp04664|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None*
local.message.claim2024-06-20T11:00:50.292+1000|||rp04664|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None*
local.message.claim2024-06-20T11:00:50.292+1000|||rp04664|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None*
local.message.claim2024-06-20T11:03:35.167+1000|||rp04664|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None*
local.message.claim2024-06-20T11:03:35.167+1000|||rp04664|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None*
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Queensland Health Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

114
checked on May 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.