Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/1710
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Sarahen_US
dc.contributor.authorQuigley, Rachelen_US
dc.contributor.authorStrivens, Edwarden_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Gavinen_US
dc.contributor.authorNorrie, Joanen_US
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Deniseen_US
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Janeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Reinholden_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-26T04:16:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-26T04:16:31Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationRussell S, Quigley R, Strivens E, Miller G, Norrie J, Craig D, Jordan J, Muller R. Validation of the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment short form (KICA-screen) for telehealth. J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Jan;27(1):54-58. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19860309. Epub 2019 Jul 8. PMID: 31284810.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/1710-
dc.descriptionAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander; dementia; remote consultation; screening; telegeriatrics; telehealth.en_US
dc.description.abstractStudies show Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are at increased risk of dementia. Whilst there have been several studies evaluating the use of telehealth for improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health outcomes, and studies validating telehealth dementia screening tools for the wider community, none have addressed the pressing need for culturally appropriate telehealth dementia screening for this at-risk population. The aim of the study was to examine the utility of using a culturally appropriate dementia screening tool (KICA-screen) in a telehealth setting. A prospective field trial was used to compare administration of the short version of the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (KICA-screen) face-to-face and via telehealth. A total of 33 medically stable Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander inpatients/outpatients participated. The stability of the KICA-screen scores, administered face-to-face and via telehealth, for each participant was measured. The two test delivery methods showed not only good correlation (Pearson's r = 0.851; p < 0.01) but good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85; p < 0.01). Results of the assessment showed that KICA-screen can be reliably administered via videoconference and resulted in comparable scores to face-to-face testing in the majority of cases. The telehealth process was acceptable to participants, who were able to understand the process and complete the full screen remotely.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE journalsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of telemedicine and telecareen_US
dc.subjectAboriginal and Torres Strait Islanderen_US
dc.subjectdementiaen_US
dc.subjectremote consultationen_US
dc.subjectscreeningen_US
dc.subjecttelegeriatricsen_US
dc.subjecttelehealthen_US
dc.titleValidation of the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment short form (KICA-screen) for telehealthen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1357633x19860309-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Sites:Cairns & Hinterland HHS Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

130
checked on Dec 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.