Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/1653
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGerhardy, Lauraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-09T23:26:36Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-09T23:26:36Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationGerhardy L. A predictive tool for vaginal birth after caesarean success in an Australian cohort. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan 15. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13473. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35032029.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/1653-
dc.descriptionCairns & Hinterland Hospital and Health Service (CHHHS) affiliated author: Laura Gerhardyen_US
dc.description.abstractWomen who have previously had a caesarean section often face the choice between planning for a vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) or an elective repeat caesarean section (CS) for future pregnancies. Informing a woman of her individualised chance of a successful VBAC can aid her decision making. The aim is to create two VBAC prediction models using an Australian cohort - one for use in labour when labour variables are known, and one for use antenatally when labour characteristics are unknown. This study was a retrospective analysis of perinatal data in Victoria, Australia, over a 10-year period. During this time, 22 062 women were recorded as attempting a VBAC with a term singleton live birth. The data were separated into three parts. A 'training set' was used to build the complete VBAC prediction model and the antenatal VBAC prediction model using multivariate logistic regression. The models were then adjusted to only include the variables that contributed to model performance. The models were validated by testing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve within the 'validation set'. Then the models were tested for accuracy within the 'test set'. Using a 'test set' of data, the models demonstrated an area under the ROC curve of 0.7887 and 0.7384 for the complete and antenatal models respectively, showing adequate performance of both models. With these models, Australian women can be counselled about their predicted chance of VBAC success.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecologyen_US
dc.subjectAustralia/epidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectcaesarean sectionen_US
dc.subjectdecision makingen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectlabouren_US
dc.subjectlogistic modelen_US
dc.subjectmaternal health serviceen_US
dc.subjectobstetricen_US
dc.subjectpregnancyen_US
dc.subjectrepeaten_US
dc.subjectretrospective studyen_US
dc.subjectvaginal birth after caesareanen_US
dc.titleA predictive tool for vaginal birth after caesarean success in an Australian cohorten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajo.13473-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Sites:Cairns & Hinterland HHS Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

144
checked on Jan 4, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.