Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/1598
Title: Quality and access - Early experience of implementing a virtual stereotactic chart round across a national network
Authors: Fitzgerald, Rhys
Pryor, David 
Aland, Trent
Anderson, Lee
Knesl, Marcel
Fong, Andrew
Lunn, Dominic 
Oar, Andrew 
Jackson, James 
Foote, Matthew 
Issue Date: Jun-2020
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
Source: Fitzgerald R, Pryor D, Aland T, Anderson L, Knesl M, Fong A, Lunn D, Oar A, Jackson J, Foote M. Quality and access - Early experience of implementing a virtual stereotactic chart round across a national network. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jun;64(3):422-426. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13031
Journal: Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
Abstract: Stereotactic radiation therapy is a highly specialised technique which requires careful and structured implementation. As part of a national stereotactic programme implementation, protocols were developed and a national stereotactic chart round was formed, which strongly recommended attendance and presentation of all cases before treatment. Herein, we describe our experiences launching a national chart round and its importance in a stereotactic programme. Stereotactic chart rounds were held via videoconference between July 2018 and July 2019. Data collected included attendances, patient-related information including, diagnosis, clinical background, treatment intent, prescribed dose and fractionation and technical approach. Consensus recommendations regarding changes to treatment approaches were also recorded. For the 12 months recorded, there were 1126 attendances, from 144 individual attendees, across 21 locations. In total, 285 cases (237 new cases, and 48 re-presentations) were presented by 27 radiation oncologists (ROs) from 13 different locations. From the cases presented, 65 changes were recommended from 53 patients (22.3%), including 27 (11.4%) changes to contours, 18 (7.6%) changes to dose prescription/fractionation, 9 (3.8%) changes to plan dosimetry, 1 (0.4%) changes to treatment technique and 10 (4.2%) recommendations for which stereotactic radiation therapy was not advised. A significant inverse relationship was found between frequency of recommended changes and the individual RO's stereotactic case load (P < 0.002). The implementation of a national stereotactic chart held via videoconference has ensured national protocol compliance across the network of locations. Furthermore, the chart rounds have allowed the entire multidisciplinary team to be provided with mentorship and guidance. Increasing number of cases presented was associated with lower rates of recommended changes highlighting the impact of experience and the need for continued mentorship.
DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13031
Keywords: Clinical Protocols;Consensus;Peer Review, Health Care;Quality Assurance, Health Care;Radiosurgery;Chart round;Dosimetry;Stereotactic
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Gold Coast Health Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

102
checked on Nov 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.