Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/11093
Title: The debate continues: a prospective, randomised, single-blind study comparing Coblation and bipolar tonsillectomy techniques
Authors: Wiltshire, D.
Cronin, M.
Lintern, N.
Fraser-Kirk, K.
Anderson, S. 
Barr, R.
Bennett, D.
Bond, C.
Issue Date: 2018
Source: J Laryngol Otol, 2018 (132) 3 p.240-245
Pages: 240-245
Journal Title: J Laryngol Otol
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Tonsillectomy is a common procedure with significant post-operative pain. This study was designed to compare post-operative pain, returns to a normal diet and normal activity, and duration of regular analgesic use in Coblation and bipolar tonsillectomy patients. METHODS: A total of 137 patients, aged 2-50 years, presenting to a single institution for tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy were recruited. Pain level, diet, analgesic use, return to normal activity and haemorrhage data were collected. RESULTS: Coblation tonsillectomy was associated with significantly less pain than bipolar tonsillectomy on post-operative days 1 (p = 0.005), 2 (p = 0.006) and 3 (p = 0.010). Mean pain scores were also significantly lower in the Coblation group (p = 0.039). Coblation patients had a significantly faster return to normal activity than bipolar tonsillectomy patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Coblation tonsillectomy is a less painful technique compared to bipolar tonsillectomy in the immediate post-operative period and in the overall post-operative period. This allows a faster return to normal activity and decreased analgesic requirements.
Description: Cairns & Hinterland Hospital and Health Service (CHHHS) affiliated author: N. Lintern
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215117002328
Appears in Sites:Cairns & Hinterland HHS Publications
Queensland Health Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

88
checked on Jul 14, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.