Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/7662
Title: | Development of an Audit Tool to Evaluate End of Life Care in the Emergency Department: A Face and Content Validity Study | Authors: | Melissa Heufel Sarah Kourouche Rebecca Mitchell Magnolia Cardona Benjamin Thomas Wing-Shan Angela Lo Marghie Murgo Debbie Vergan Kate Curtis |
Issue Date: | 19-Feb-2025 | Journal: | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | Abstract: | Objectives:Emergency Departments (ED) are increasingly caring for patients with acute, chronic and terminal conditions requiring End of Life Care (EOLC). There is no published and validated tool available to evaluate EOLC delivery of patients dying in the ED. This study describes the face and content validity testing process to develop, refine and test a new and unique audit tool to evaluate EOLC in the ED.Methods: The face and content validation process used a three-round modified-Delphi technique. We consulted 11 experts to assess the proposed 89 items. Face validity explored the overall question of appropriateness and relevance; and content validity examined relevance ratings using the Content Validity Index (CVI) 4-point Likert scale in two rounds. Iterative assessment of ratings led to inclusion (CVI > 0.78), revision (CVI 0.65 to < 0.78) or exclusion (CVI < 0.65) of items from the tool.Results: Of the initial 89 items, 66 were included (CVI > 0.78), 16 items revised (scores 0.65 to < 0.78), seven were removed (scores < 0.65) and two new items suggested. Items covered the constructs patient characteristics, circumstances of death, ED performance, communication and care planning, recognition of dying, care delivery, and needs of families and carers. Scale CVI achieved 0.90. The consolidated list of 81 items achieved acceptable face validity and excellent content validity.Conclusion:Face and content validity of the ED EOLC audit tool achieved acceptable item-CVI scores and an excellent scale-CVI score. We recommend external validation of its components in real-life settings to monitor and set locally relevant clinical practice benchmarks. |
Appears in Sites: | Publication workflow Queensland Health Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.