Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Review article: Sepsis in the emergency department - Part 3: Treatment||Authors:||Fraser, J. F.
Williams, J. M.
Macdonald, S. P.
|Issue Date:||2018||Source:||Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA Apr 30, (2), 2018, p. 144-151||Pages:||144-151||Journal Title:||Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA||Journal:||Emerg Med Australas||Abstract:||Although comprehensive guidelines for treatment of sepsis exist, current research continues to refine and revise several aspects of management. Imperatives for rapid administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics for all patients with sepsis may not be supported by contemporary data. Many patients may be better served by a more judicious approach allowing consideration of investigation results and evidence-based guidelines. Conventional fluid therapy has been challenged with early evidence supporting balanced, restricted fluid and early vasopressor use. Albumin, vasopressin and hydrocortisone have each been shown to support blood pressure and reduce catecholamine requirements but without effect on mortality, and as such should be considered for ED patients with septic shock on a case-by-case basis. Measurement of quality care in sepsis should incorporate quality of blood cultures and guideline-appropriateness of antibiotics, as well as timeliness of therapy. Local audit is an essential and effective means to improve practice. Multicentre consolidation of data through agreed minimum sepsis data sets would provide baseline quality data, required for the design and evaluation of interventions.1742-6723Williams, Julian M
Macdonald, Stephen Pj
Fraser, John F
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Apr;30(2):144-151. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12951.
|Appears in Collections:||Publications|
checked on Feb 25, 2020
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.