Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/6961
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, Matthew D.-
dc.contributor.authorCondon, Kathleena-
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Paul D.-
dc.contributor.authorSuresh, Sadasivam-
dc.contributor.authorZahir, Syeda Farah-
dc.contributor.authorSly, Peter D.-
dc.contributor.authorBlake, Tamara L.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T03:49:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-27T03:49:54Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationPediatric pulmonology, 2024 (59) 11 p.2732-2747en
dc.identifier.urihttps://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/6961-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Several techniques can be used to assess bronchodilator response (BDR) in preschool-aged children, including spirometry, respiratory oscillometry, the interrupter technique, and specific airway resistance. However, there has not been a systematic comparison of BDR thresholds across studies yet.; Methods: A systematic review was performed on all studies up to May 2023 measuring a bronchodilator effect in children 2-6 years old using one of these techniques (PROSPERO CRD42021264659). Studies were identified using MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINAHL via EBSCO, Web of Science databases, and reference lists of relevant manuscripts.; Results: Of 1224 screened studies, 43 were included. Over 85% were from predominantly European ancestry populations, and only 22 studies (51.2%) calculated a BDR cutoff based on a healthy control group. Five studies included triplicate testing with a placebo to account for the within-subject intrasession repeatability. A relative BDR was most consistently reported by the included studies (95%) but varied widely across all techniques. Various statistical methods were used to define a BDR, with six studies using receiver operating characteristic analyses to measure the discriminative power to distinguish healthy from wheezy and asthmatic children.; Conclusion: A BDR in 2- to 6-year-olds cannot be universally defined based on the reviewed literature due to inconsistent methodology and cutoff calculations. Further studies incorporating robust methods using either distribution-based or clinical anchor-based approaches to define BDR are required. (© 2024 The Author(s). Pediatric Pulmonology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)-
dc.titleAssessment of bronchodilator response in preschoolers: A systematic review-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ppul.27112-
dc.relation.urlhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,athens&db=mdc&AN=38953717&site=ehost-live-
dc.identifier.journaltitlePediatric pulmonology-
dc.identifier.risid112-
dc.description.pages2732-2747-
dc.description.volume59-
dc.description.issue11-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Queensland Health Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

58
checked on Jul 15, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.