Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/6635
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Brooks E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tett SE | - |
dc.contributor.author | Isbel NM | - |
dc.contributor.author | McWhinney B | - |
dc.contributor.author | Staatz CE | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-29T23:23:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-29T23:23:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/6635 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h4>Background</h4>Bayesian forecasting-based limited sampling strategies (LSSs) for tacrolimus have not been evaluated for the prediction of subsequent tacrolimus exposure. This study examined the predictive performance of Bayesian forecasting programs/services for the estimation of future tacrolimus area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to 12 hours (AUC0-12) in kidney transplant recipients.<h4>Methods</h4>Tacrolimus concentrations were measured in 20 adult kidney transplant recipients, 1 month post-transplant, on 2 occasions one week apart. Twelve samples were taken predose and 13 samples were taken postdose at the specified times on the first and second sampling occasions, respectively. The predicted AUC0-12 (AUCpredicted) was estimated using Bayesian forecasting programs/services and data from both sampling occasions for each patient and compared with the fully measured AUC0-12 (AUCmeasured) calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule on the second sampling occasion. The bias (median percentage prediction error [MPPE]) and imprecision (median absolute prediction error [MAPE]) were determined.<h4>Results</h4>Three programs/services were evaluated using different LSSs (C0; C0, C1, C3; C0, C1, C2, C4; and all available concentrations). MPPE and MAPE for the prediction of fully measured AUC0-12 were <15% for each program/service (with the exclusion of when only C0 was used), when using estimated AUC from data on the same (second) occasion. The MPPE and MAPE for the prediction of a future fully measured AUC0-12 were <15% for 2 programs/services (and for the third when participants who had a tacrolimus dose change between sampling days were excluded), when the occasion 1-AUCpredicted, using C0, C1, and C3, was compared with the occasion 2-AUCmeasured.<h4>Conclusions</h4>All 3 Bayesian forecasting programs/services evaluated had acceptable bias and imprecision for predicting a future AUC0-12, using tacrolimus concentrations at C0, C1, and C3, and could be used for the accurate prediction of tacrolimus exposure in adult kidney transplant recipients. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Therapeutic drug monitoring | - |
dc.title | Evaluation of Bayesian Forecasting Methods for Prediction of Tacrolimus Exposure Using Samples Taken on Two Occasions in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients. | - |
dc.type | Journal Article | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | Journal Article | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
Appears in Sites: | Queensland Health Publications |
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.