Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/6353
Title: Core requirements of frailty screening in the emergency department: an international Delphi consensus study
Authors: Elizabeth Moloney
Mark R O’Donovan
Christopher R. Carpenter
Fabio Salvi
Elsa Dent
Simon Mooijaart
Emiel Hoogendijk
Jean Woo
John Morley
Ruth E Hubbard
Matteo Cesari
Emer Ahern
Roman Romero-Ortuno
Rosa McNamara
Anne O’Keefe
Ann Healy
Pieter Heeren
Darren Mcloughlin
Conor Deasy
Louise Martin
Audrey-Anne Brousseau
Duygu Sezgin
Paul Bernard
Kara Mc Loughlin
Jiraporn Sri-on
Don Melady
Lucinda Edge
Ide O’Shaughnessy
Jill Van Damme
Magnolia Cardona 
Jennifer Kirby
Lauren Southerland
Andrew Costa
Douglas Sinclair
Cathy Maxwell
Marie Doyle
Ebony Lewis
Grace Corcoran
Debra Eagles
Frances Dockery
Simon Conroy
Suzanne Timmons
Rónán O'Caoimh
Issue Date: 2024
Journal: Age and Ageing
Abstract: Abstract Introduction Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes among patients attending emergency departments (EDs). While multiple frailty screens are available, little is known about which variables are important to incorporate and how best to facilitate accurate, yet prompt ED screening. To understand the core requirements of frailty screening in ED, we conducted an international, modified, electronic two-round Delphi consensus study. Methods A two-round electronic Delphi involving 37 participants from 10 countries was undertaken. Statements were generated from a prior systematic review examining frailty screening instruments in ED (logistic, psychometric and clinimetric properties). Reflexive thematic analysis generated a list of 56 statements for Round 1 (August–September 2021). Four main themes identified were: (i) principles of frailty screening, (ii) practicalities and logistics, (iii) frailty domains and (iv) frailty risk factors. Results In Round 1, 13/56 statements (23%) were accepted. Following feedback, 22 new statements were created and 35 were re-circulated in Round 2 (October 2021). Of these, 19 (54%) were finally accepted. It was agreed that ideal frailty screens should be short (<5 min), multidimensional and well-calibrated across the spectrum of frailty, reflecting baseline status 2–4 weeks before presentation. Screening should ideally be routine, prompt (<4 h after arrival) and completed at first contact in ED. Functional ability, mobility, cognition, medication use and social factors were identified as the most important variables to include. Conclusions Although a clear consensus was reached on important requirements of frailty screening in ED, and variables to include in an ideal screen, more research is required to operationalise screening in clinical practice.
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Sites:Forensic and Scientific Services Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on Mar 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.