Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/6208
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarnard, Paigeen
dc.contributor.authorStephensen, Breeen
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Georgiaen
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Johnsonen
dc.contributor.authorde Jager, Elzerieen
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, Matthewen
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-05T04:09:16Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-05T04:09:16Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationBarnard P, Stephensen B, Taylor G, Huang J, de Jager E, McMahon M. Management & surveillance of rectal neuroendocrine tumours: a single-centre retrospective analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2024 Jun;94(6):1138-1145. doi: 10.1111/ans.18895. Epub 2024 Feb 12. PMID: 38345172.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/6208-
dc.descriptionCairns & Hinterland Hospital and Health Service (CHHHS) affiliated authors: Georgia Taylor, Matthew McMahonen
dc.description.abstractRectal neuroendocrine tumours (rNETs) are rare but are increasing in incidence. Current management and surveillance recommendations are based on low-grade evidence. Follow-up practices are often inconsistent and costly. This retrospective study analyses a single-centre's experience with rNETs to assess incidence, management practices, outcomes, and guideline adherence. This is a single-centre retrospective study from Queensland Australia, spanning from 2012 to 2023. Twenty-eight rNET cases met inclusion criteria. Examined parameters included incidence, management, outcomes and adherence to European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) guidelines. R1 resection rate was analysed for associations with resection technique and lesion recognition and recurrence rate was assessed in all patients. This study shows an increasing incidence of rNETs during the study period, reflecting a global trend. R1 resection rate at initial endoscopy was 75%. There was a general lack of advanced endoscopic techniques utilized and poor lesion recognition, however a statistically significant correlation was not established between these factors and an R1 result (P < 0.05). Most patients with an R1 result had subsequent re-resection to render the result R0, however five patients (33%) underwent surveillance with no reports of recurrence on follow-up. Overall, follow-up practices in our cohort were inconsistent and did not adhere to guidelines. rNETs are increasing in incidence, emphasizing the need for standardized management and surveillance. Further training is required for rNET recognition and advanced endoscopic resection techniques. Further research is required to assess long-term outcomes in surveilled R1 cases, understand optimal endoscopic resection techniques and further develop local surveillance guidelines.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRoyal Australasian College of Surgeonsen
dc.relation.ispartofAnz Journal of Surgeryen
dc.subjectadvanced endoscopic techniquesen
dc.subjectR0 resectionen
dc.subjectR1 resectionen
dc.subjectrectal neuroendocrine tumoren
dc.titleManagement & surveillance of rectal neuroendocrine tumours: a single-centre retrospective analysisen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ans.18895-
dc.identifier.pmid38345172-
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnz Journal of Surgery-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Sites:Cairns & Hinterland HHS Publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Management surveillance of rectal neuroendocrine tumours a single‐centre.pdf1.33 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Oct 9, 2024

Download(s)

18
checked on Oct 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.