Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/608
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurke, M. T.en
dc.contributor.authorGray, N. A.en
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-16T20:36:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-16T20:36:05Z-
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.citationSeptember Conference: 47th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Nephrology Adelaide, SA Australia. Conference Start: 20110919 Conference End: 20110921. Conference Publication: (var.pagings). 16 , 2011, p. 82en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/608-
dc.description.abstractAim: To determine nursing knowledge about ANZDATA and nursing attitudes to data collection. Background: Many renal units rely on nursing staff to collect and enter data for ANZDATA. Little is known about nurses' knowledge of ANZDATA or attitudes to the data collection. Methods: Nurses at a public hospital renal unit, 2 affiliated satellite dialysis units, and 3 private haemodialysis units were surveyed. Results: 40 surveys were completed (response rate 62%). 88% female, 71% aged 41+ years, 88% mainly work in a haemodialysis unit. Time in renal nursing was 0-2 years (12%), 3-5 years (27%), 6-10 years (22%), 10+ years (39%). 61% were nursing level NO1 and 24% level NO2. 59% reported completing ANZDATA entry, but 79% reported little or no training to enter data. Nurses obtained data from chart searches or asking the patient. They sometimes ask other nursing staff or check the public hospital pathology results. Nurses rarely ask medical staff, patient families, or check private pathology. Nurses considered data entry for dialysis patients the role of nurses (63%) or a data manager (22%). Nurses considered data entry for transplant patients the role of doctors (37%), nurses (27%), data manager (23%), and transplant nurse (10%). Many considered ANZDATA entry time consuming, frustrating, and stressful. 68% thought ANZDATA was moderately or very important. Nurses had a clear understanding of the uses of ANZDATA. Conclusions: Improving feedback about ANZDATA reports and education about data collection may improve nurse attitudes and data quality.<br />en
dc.languageenen
dc.relation.ispartofNephrologyen
dc.titleNurses perspectives on the Australian and New Zealand dialysis and transplant registry (ANZDATA)en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.relation.urlhttp://getit.slq.qld.gov.au/qhealth?sid=OVID:embase&id=pmid:&id=doi:10.1111%2Fj.1440-1797.2011.01492.x&issn=1320-5358&isbn=&volume=16&issue=&spage=82&pages=82&date=2011&title=Nephrology&atitle=Nurses+perspectives+on+the+Australian+and+New+Zealand+dialysis+and+transplant+registry+%28ANZDATA%29&aulast=Burke&pid=%3Cauthor%3EBurke+M.T.%3BGray+N.A.%3C%2Fauthor%3E%3CAN%3E70532568%3C%2FAN%3E%3CDT%3EJournal%3A+Conference+Abstract%3C%2FDT%3Een
dc.identifier.risid432en
dc.description.pages82en
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Sites:Sunshine Coast HHS Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

140
checked on Apr 24, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.