Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/58
Title: Evaluating the effectiveness of intensive versus non-intensive image interpretation education for radiographers: a randomised control trial study protocol
Authors: McPhail, S. M.
Neep, M. J.
Eastgate, P.
Steffens, T.
Issue Date: 2018
Source: 65, (1), 2018, p. 63-70
Pages: 63-70
Journal: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Abstract: Radiographer commenting systems have not been successfully implemented in many Australian hospitals, despite evidence of their benefit and adoption elsewhere, such as the United Kingdom. An important contributor to the lack of widespread adoption of radiographer commenting in Australia (and likely elsewhere) is the limited availability of accessible education options for radiographers. The purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of the same image interpretation education program delivered over an intensive 2-day period (intensive format) versus a series of shorter regular workshops (non-intensive format). The study design is a multicentre, stratified (by years of experience) two group parallel-arm single-blind (assessor blinded) randomised controlled trial. Participants will be allocated to one of the two groups: (1) intensive format of education or (2) non-intensive format of education in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will undergo assessments before education, at 1 week post-intervention completion and at 12 weeks post-intervention completion. Findings from this trial will be of relevance to radiographers seeking image interpretation training as well as organisations providing image interpretation education to prepare clinical staff for participation in a radiographer commenting system. A limitation of the trial is that the sample will be inclusive of radiographers, and findings may not be able to be directly extrapolated to other clinical disciplines (e.g. junior doctors, physiotherapists or nurse practitioners).L6204788642018-02-06
2018-03-21
DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.264
1300
Resources: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L620478864http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.264
http://linksource.ebsco.com/ls.b6e6cc08-c492-42af-aec4-c6084e18e68c.true/linking.aspx?sid=EMBASE&issn=20513909&id=doi:10.1002%2Fjmrs.264&atitle=Evaluating+the+effectiveness+of+intensive+versus+non-intensive+image+interpretation+education+for+radiographers%3A+a+randomised+control+trial+study+protocol&stitle=J.+Med.+Radial.+Sci.&title=Journal+of+Medical+Radiation+Sciences&volume=65&issue=1&spage=63&epage=70&aulast=Neep&aufirst=Michael+J.&auinit=M.J.&aufull=Neep+M.J.&coden=&isbn=&pages=63-70&date=2018&auinit1=M&auinitm=J.
Keywords: radiography;education
Keywords: articleclinical effectiveness;computer assisted diagnosis;controlled study;emergency health service;follow up;health program;human;image analysis;intensive care nursing;medical education;memory consolidation;multicenter study;outcome assessment;postgraduate education;priority journal;questionnaire;randomized controlled trial
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Sunshine Coast HHS Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JMRS-65-63.pdf145.24 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

122
checked on Mar 25, 2025

Download(s)

66
checked on Mar 25, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.