Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4981
Title: Validity and repeatability of contour-based visotec distance stereoacuity test
Authors: Ale Magar, J.B. 
Dai, S. H.
Willett, F. A.
Sleep, M. G.
Shah, S. P.
Issue Date: 2022
Source: , 2022, p. 1-7
Pages: 1-7
Journal: Clinical & experimental optometry
Abstract: CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The clinical assessment of distance stereoacuity is important in some ocular conditions. Given the different neurophysiological mechanism for crossed and uncrossed stereoacuities, evaluation of both may provide additional insight into binocular vision disorders. BACKGROUND: Clinical devices measuring distance crossed and uncrossed stereopsis are not readily available. Visotec Distance Stereo Test (VDST) is a contour-based device designed to measure both forms of distance stereoacuity. This study assesses the validity and test-retest reliability of the device in comparison to the random dot-based Randot Distance Stereo Test (RDST). METHOD: VDST and RDST were administered to a total of 107 children, that included 51 'normal' and 56 'abnormal' (37 intermittent exotropia and 19 amblyopia) between the ages of 5 and 15 years. Two examiners retested stereoacuities in a sub-set of 62 randomly selected subjects. Stereoacuity was transformed to log scale. 95% limits of agreement were calculated for test-retest reliability. The Bland-Altman plot was used to demonstrate the agreement between the tests and the examiners. RESULTS: The mean ± SD crossed distance stereoacuities using VDST in normal, intermittent exotropia and amblyopic children were 93.1 ± 43.8, 161.9 ± 89.8 and 236.3 ± 122.4 arcseconds, respectively. For uncrossed stereoacuity, these were 104.7 ± 54.0, 187.6 ± 89.6 and 265.5 ± 144.0 arcseconds, respectively. Crossed stereoacuity was significantly better than uncrossed stereoacuity. 95% limits of test-retest agreement for crossed and uncrossed stereoacuities using the VDST were 0.27 and 0.30, respectively. An exact test-retest match using VDST was 84% in normals and 77% in abnormals for crossed and 83% in normal and 74% in abnormal for uncrossed stereoacuities. CONCLUSION: VDST is a reliable, valid and easy-to-administer distance crossed and uncrossed stereoacuity measuring device. Further studies are required to establish the clinical importance of assessing these two forms stereoacuities in relation to various binocular vision disorders.L6371926562022-02-14
DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2033599
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L637192656&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2022.2033599 |
Keywords: divergent strabismus;amblyopiaarticle;binocular vision;child;clinical assessment;controlled study;female;human;intermethod comparison;limit of agreement;major clinical study;male;randomized controlled trial;stereopsis measuring instrument;test retest reliability;validity;visual disorder
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

68
checked on Mar 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.