Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4904
Title: Understanding consumer preference for vascular access safety and quality measurement: an international survey
Authors: Marsh, Nicole 
Schults, Jessica 
Ray-Barruel, Gillian 
Kleidon, Tricia 
Paterson, Rebecca
Cooke, Marie
Ullman, Amanda 
McNeil, Keith
Chopra, Vineet
Charles, Karina
Sturgess, David J.
Rickard, Claire
Sullivan, Clair 
Issue Date: 2022
Source: 46, (1), 2022, p. 12-20
Pages: 12-20
Journal: Australian Health Review
Abstract: Objectives. The aim of this study was to examine patient perceptions regarding vascular access quality measurement. Methods. A web-based, cross-sectional survey was performed using a convenience sample of healthcare consumers with vascular access experience, recruited from September 2019 to June 2020. Survey respondents were asked to rate the perceived importance of 50 vascular access data items, including patient demographics, clinical and device characteristics, and insertion, management and complication data. Data were ranked using a five-point Likert scale (1, least important; 5, most important), and are reported as median values. Respondents proposed additional items and explored broader perspectives using free-text responses, which were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results. In all, 68 consumers completed the survey. Participants were primarily female (82%), aged 40-49 years (29%) and living in Australia or New Zealand (84%). All respondents indicated that measuring the quality of vascular access care was important. Of the 50 items, 37 (74%) were perceived as 'most important' (median score 5), with measures of quality (i.e. outcomes and complications) rated highly (e.g. thrombosis and primary blood stream infection). Participants proposed 16 additional items. 'Gender' received the lowest perceived importance score (median score 3). Two themes emerged from the qualitative analysis of broader perspectives: (1) measurement of vascular access device complication severity and associated factors; and (2) patient experience. Conclusion. Measuring vascular access quality and safety is important to consumers. Outcome and complication measures were rated 'most important', with respondents identifying a need for increased monitoring of their overall vascular access journey through the health system.research; tables/charts. Journal Subset: Australia & New Zealand; Health Services Administration; Peer Reviewed. NLM UID: 8214381.
DOI: 10.1071/AH21053
Resources: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,athens&db=ccm&AN=155075850&site=ehost-live
Keywords: Female;Adult;Middle Age;Severity of Illness;Treatment Outcomes;Consumer Participation;Sample Size;Scoping Review;Data Analysis Software;Descriptive Statistics;Aged;Patient Satisfaction;Human;Convenience Sample;Cross Sectional Studies;Patient AttitudesVascular Access Devices;Thematic Analysis;Male;Quality Assessment;Patient Safety;Surveys;Quality of Life;Quality of Health Care
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

102
checked on Mar 25, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.