Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4603
Title: Single-View Echocardiography by Nonexpert Practitioners to Detect Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Prospective Study of Diagnostic Accuracy
Authors: Yan, J.
Francis, L. A.
Draper, A. D. K.
James, C. L.
Davis, K.
Mitchell, A.
Remenyi, B.
Ralph, A. P.
Roberts, K. V.
Engelman, D.
Da Silva Almeida, I.
Francis, J. R.
Whalley, G. A.
Kaethner, A.
Fairhurst, H.
Hardefeldt, H.
Reeves, B.
Auld, B.
Marangou, J.
Horton, A.
Wheaton, G.
Robertson, T.
Ryan, C.
Brown, S.
Smith, G.
Dos Santos, J.
Flavio, R.
Embaum, K.
Da Graca Noronha, M.
Lopes Belo, S.
Madeira Santos, C.
Georginha Dos Santos, M.
Cabral, J.
Do Rosario, I.
Harries, J.
Issue Date: 2021
Source: 14, (8), 2021, p. E011790
Pages: E011790
Journal: Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Abstract: Background: Echocardiographic screening can detect asymptomatic cases of rheumatic heart disease (RHD), facilitating access to treatment. Barriers to implementation of echocardiographic screening include the requirement for expensive equipment and expert practitioners. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated echocardiographic screening protocol (single parasternal-long-axis view with a sweep of the heart) performed by briefly trained, nonexpert practitioners using handheld ultrasound devices. Methods: Participants aged 5 to 20 years in Timor-Leste and the Northern Territory of Australia had 2 echocardiograms: one performed by an expert echocardiographer using a GE Vivid I or Vivid Q portable ultrasound device (reference test), and one performed by a nonexpert practitioner using a GE Vscan handheld ultrasound device (index test). The accuracy of the index test, compared with the reference test, for identifying cases with definite or borderline RHD was determined. Results: There were 3111 enrolled participants; 2573 had both an index test and reference test. Median age was 12 years (interquartile range, 10-15); 58.2% were female. Proportion with definite or borderline RHD was 5.52% (95% CI, 4.70-6.47); proportion with definite RHD was 3.23% (95% CI, 2.61-3.98). Compared with the reference test, sensitivity of the index test for definite or borderline RHD was 70.4% (95% CI, 62.2-77.8), specificity was 78.1% (95% CI, 76.4-79.8). Conclusions: Nonexpert practitioners can be trained to perform single parasternal-long-axis view with a sweep of the heart echocardiography. However, the specificity and sensitivity are inadequate for echocardiographic screening. Improved training for nonexpert practitioners should be investigated.L6357889312021-08-26
2022-05-25
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.011790
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L635788931&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.011790 |
Keywords: Vivid Q;adolescent;adult;aortic regurgitation;article;child;cross-sectional study;data analysis;diagnostic test accuracy study;echocardiography;experimental test;female;human;mitral valve regurgitation;nonexpert practitioner;normal human;physician;preschool child;reference test;rheumatic heart disease;school child;sensitivity and specificity;training;Vscan;portable ultrasound scannerreal time ultrasound scanner;human experiment;index test;male;Vivid
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

108
checked on Mar 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.