Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4557
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, H. P. J.en
dc.contributor.authorCarty, Christopheren
dc.contributor.authorGillett, J. G.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:54:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:54:02Z-
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citation42, (3), 2015, p. 398-401en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4557-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper was to systematically assess the effect of Oxford Foot Model (OFM) marker misplacement on hindfoot relative to tibia, and forefoot relative to hindfoot kinematic calculations during the stance phase of gait. Marker trajectories were recorded with an 8-camera motion analysis system (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., UK) and ground reaction forces were recorded from three force platforms (AMTI, USA). A custom built marker cluster consisting of 4 markers in a square arrangement (diagonal distance 2. cm) was used to assess the effect of marker misplacement in the superior, inferior, anterior and posterior direction for the sustentaculum tali (STL), the proximal 1st metatarsal (P1M), distal 5th metatarsal (D5M), proximal 5th metatarsal (P5M) and lateral calcaneus (LCA) markers. In addition manual movement of the heel complex 1. cm superiorly, inferiorly, medially and laterally, and also an alignment error of 10° inversion and 10° eversion was assessed. Clinically meaningful effects of marker misplacement were determined using a threshold indicating the minimal clinically important difference. Misplacement of the heel-wand complex had the most pronounced effect on mean kinematic profiles during the stance phase across all degrees-of-freedom with respect to hindfoot-tibia and forefoot-hindfoot angles. Vertical marker misplacement of the D5M and P5M markers affected the sagittal plane, and to a lesser extent frontal plane, forefoot-hindfoot kinematics. In conclusion, the OFM is highly sensitive to misplacement of the heel-wand complex in all directions and the P5M marker in the vertical direction.L6051384592015-07-14 <br />2015-10-06 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofGait and Postureen
dc.titleSensitivity of the Oxford Foot Model to marker misplacement: A systematic single-case investigationen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.06.189en
dc.subject.keywordsmotion analysis systemen
dc.subject.keywordsOxford Foot Modelen
dc.subject.keywordspriority journalen
dc.subject.keywordssensitivity analysisen
dc.subject.keywordstibiaen
dc.subject.keywordskinematicsen
dc.subject.keywordsforefooten
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.subject.keywordsgaiten
dc.subject.keywordsmodelen
dc.subject.keywordsground reaction forceen
dc.subject.keywordsarticlecalcaneusen
dc.subject.keywordsmetatarsal boneen
dc.subject.keywordshindlimben
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L605138459&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.06.189 |en
dc.identifier.risid2000en
dc.description.pages398-401en
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

90
checked on Apr 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.