Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/4059
Title: Penile nerve block predicts higher revision surgery rate following distal hypospadias repair when compared with caudal epidural block: A consecutive cohort study
Authors: Ngoo, A.
Patel, B.
McBride, C. A.
Borzi, P.
Issue Date: 2020
Source: 16, (4), 2020, p. 439.e1-439.e6
Pages: 439.e1-439.e6
Journal: Journal of Pediatric Urology
Abstract: Introduction: Recent literature has suggested caudal epidural blocks (CEB) may increase revision surgery rates following hypospadias repair. We sought to investigate this using a large, multi-surgeon series. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to identify the impact of CEB or penile nerve blocks (PNB) on revision surgery rates following distal hypospadias repair at our centre. Study design: A prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients undergoing primary hypospadias repairs under the supervision of 8 different paediatric surgeons at our centre between January 2015 and December 2018 was queried for the following potential risk factors: Age at surgery, American Society of Anaesthesiologist's (ASA) grade, hypospadias type, type of surgery, CEB or PNB, and training level of primary surgeon. Revision surgery was defined as reoperation for fistulas, dehiscence, strictures or meatal stenosis. Univariate and Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. Results: 188 patients underwent primary distal hypospadias repair over the study time period. Patients were aged between 7 months and 15 years of age. Median age at surgery was 14 months. Revision surgery was performed for 31 patients (16.5%). Indications were urethrocutaneous fistula (n = 17, 9.0%), meatal stenosis or stricture (n = 9, 4.8%) and glans dehiscence (n = 5, 2.7%). 114 (60.6%) received a penile block and 74 (39.4%) a caudal block. On univariate analysis, PNB (HR 2.55 95% CI 1.04–6.27, p = 0.04) was statistically significant for revision surgery. This association remained significant on multivariate analysis (HR 2.74 95% CI 1.09–6.92, p = 0.03). All other prognostic factors examined were not statistically significant for revision surgery. Discussion: Our findings suggest PNB are associated with higher revision surgery rates following distal hypospadias repair. This contrasts with the findings of other authors. Conclusion: Our study is the first to demonstrate an association between PNB and higher revision surgery rates following distal hypospadias repair.[Formula presented]L20069548862020-07-15
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.05.150
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2006954886&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.05.150 |
Keywords: epidural anesthesia;human;hypospadias;infant;intermethod comparison;major clinical study;male;nerve block;outcome assessment;penile nerve block;penis glans;adjuvant therapy;reoperation;risk factor;treatment indication;urethra fistula;urethra stenosis;wound dehiscence;bupivacaineclonidine;priority journal;adolescent;article;child;cohort analysis
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on Mar 25, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.