Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3917
Title: Outcomes for young children with molecularly defined ependymoma treated on the multi-institutional SJYC07 clinical trial
Authors: Ellison, D. W.
Boop, F. A.
Merchant, T. E.
Gajjar, A. J.
Upadhyaya, S.
Robinson, G. W.
Orr, B.
Onar-Thomas, A.
Billups, C. A.
Armstrong, G. T.
Sadighi, Z. S.
Hassall, T.
Bowers, D. C.
Bendel, A. E.
Crawford, J. R.
Partap, S.
Klimo, P.
Harreld, J. H.
Tinkle, C. L.
Indelicato, D. J.
Issue Date: 2018
Source: 36, (15), 2018
Journal: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract: Background: Retrospective reports of poor outcomes of ependymoma (EPN) subgroups, posterior fossa A (PF-EPN-A) and supratentorial C11orf95-RELA (ST-EPN-RELA), need confirmation in prospective trials. Methods: Fifty-four children (median age 1.6 y, range 0.4-3.1) with newly diagnosed EPN (WHO grade II/ III) were treated (2008-2016) with maximal safe surgical resection + chemotherapy (high-dose methotrexate, vincristine, cisplatin and cyclophosphamide), consolidation using focal conformal radiation therapy (RT) to 54Gy (M0) or additional cyclophosphamide/topotecan with no RT (M+) and 6 months of oral maintenance chemotherapy. DNA methylation was performed using Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip and profiled on the DKFZ MN2.0 classifier. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization was used to determine tumor 1q status. Results: No participant had imaging evidence of metastatic disease at diagnosis (M0 = 40, M1 = 1, CSF not obtained = 13). At a median follow-up of 3.6 y (range, 1.0-9.3), 49 patients (91%) were alive with a 4-y PFS = 77.0%±7.5% and OS = 91.3%±5.2%. There was no significant difference in outcomes by subgroup [4-y PFS: PF-EPN-A (n = 42), 74.3%±8.2%; ST-EPN-RELA (n = 8), 80%±20.7%; ST-EPN-YAP (n = 4), 100%, p = 0.42]. Five patients with PF-EPN-A had 1q gain but no difference in outcome (p = 0.59 for OS and p = 0.15 for PFS). For 6 patients with subtotal resection (STR) prior to RT, outcome was inferior to those of the 48 with gross-total or near-total resection (4-y PFS = 27.8%±16.7% vs 81.7% ±7.3%, p = 0.047). Fourteen patients experienced progression at a median time of 28 mos (range, 1.7m-7.3 y). Recurrence was distant (n = 7), local (n = 6), or combined (n = 1), 3/14 recurred at 6 (n = 2) and 7 years post diagnosis. Conclusions: In a uniformly treated, prospective EPN cohort, we found no significant difference in PFS or OS by molecular subgroup; however, the number of ST-EPNRELA was small. In our data, 1q was not associated with outcome in PF-EPN-A, though only 5 subjects had 1q gain. Patients with STR prior to RT had inferior outcomes. Close surveillance and follow-up beyond 5 years is warranted due to risk of metastasis and late progression.L6259763632019-01-22
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.10548
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L625976363&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.10548 |
Keywords: child;classifier;clinical article;cohort analysis;conference abstract;conformal radiotherapy;controlled study;DNA methylation;drug megadose;drug therapy;ependymoma;female;fluorescence in situ hybridization;follow up;human;transcription factor RelA;maintenance chemotherapy;male;metastasis;multicenter study;prospective study;radiotherapy;relapse;surgery;topotecan;methotrexate;endogenous compound;cisplatincyclophosphamide;infant;vincristine;cancer radiotherapy;cancer recurrence;cancer surgery
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on Mar 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.