Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3808
Title: NIVOLUMAB WITH OR WITHOUT IPILIMUMAB IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH HIGH-GRADE CNS MALIGNANCIES: EFFICACY, SAFETY, BIOMARKER, AND PHARMACOKINETIC RESULTS FROM CHECKMATE 908
Authors: Foreman, N. K.
Hargrave, D.
Lassaletta, A.
André, N.
Hansford, J. R.
Hassall, T.
Eyrich, M.
Gururangan, S.
Bartels, U.
Gajjar, A.
Howell, L.
Warad, D.
Pacius, M.
Tam, R.
Wang, Y.
Zhu, L.
Doz, F.
Dunkel, I. J.
Cohen, K.
Issue Date: 2022
Source: 24 , 2022, p. i82-i83
Pages: i82-i83
Journal: Neuro-Oncology
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding checkpoint inhibitor efficacy for pediatric CNS malignancies. METHODS: CheckMate 908 is an open-label, sequential-arm, phase 1b/2 study investigating nivolumab (NIVO) and NIVO + ipilimumab (IPI) in 5 cohorts of pediatric patients previously treated with standard-of-care (NCT03130959). Patients received NIVO-3mg/kg Q2W or NIVO-3mg/kg + IPI-1mg/kg Q3W (4 doses) followed by NIVO-3mg/kg Q2W. Primary endpoints included OS (newly diagnosed DIPG) and PFS (other CNS cohorts); secondary endpoints included other efficacy metrics/safety. Exploratory endpoints included pharmacokinetics/biomarker analyses. Comparisons between treatments/cohorts were not planned. RESULTS: At data cutoff (13-Jan-2021), 166 patients received NIVO (n=85) or NIVO+IPI (n=81) at median (m) ages of 10.0yrs (range, 1-21) and 11.0yrs (1-21), respectively. In newly diagnosed DIPG, mOS (80% CI) was 11.7mos (10.3-16.5) with NIVO (n=23) and 10.8mos (9.1-15.8) with NIVO+IPI (n=22). In recurrent/progressive HGG, mPFS (80% CI) was 1.7mos (1.4-2.7) with NIVO (n=16) and 1.3mos (1.2-1.5) with NIVO+IPI (n=15). In relapsed/resistant medulloblastoma, mPFS (80% CI) was 1.4mos (1.2-1.4) with NIVO (n=15) and 2.8mos (1.5-4.5) with NIVO+IPI (n=15). In relapsed/resistant ependymoma, mPFS (80% CI) was 1.4mos (1.4-2.6) with NIVO (n=12) and 4.6mos (1.4-5.4) with NIVO+IPI (n=10). In other recurrent/progressive CNS tumors, mPFS (95% CI) was 1.2mos (1.1-1.3) with NIVO (n=19) and 1.6mos (1.3-3.5) with NIVO+IPI (n=19). Median treatment duration was 2.1mos (range, 0-41.7+ [NIVO]/0-29.6+ [NIVO+IPI]). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 14.1% (NIVO) and 27.2% (NIVO+IPI) of patients. NIVO and IPI first dose trough concentrations were lower in youngest and lowest-weight patients. Baseline tumor PD-L1 expression was not associated with survival. Tumor mutational burden was high in 1 patient (NIVO+IPI) with HGG (OS=11.0mos). CONCLUSIONS: NIVO±IPI demonstrated no clinical benefit in pediatric patients with high-grade CNS malignancies, consistent with available historical data. The safety profiles were manageable.L6385102032022-07-26
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac079.301
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L638510203&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.301 |
Keywords: phase 1 clinical trial;protein expression;treatment duration;trough concentration;tumor mutational burden;biological markerendogenous compound;ipilimumab;nivolumab;programmed death 1 ligand 1;cancer patient;cancer recurrence;cancer resistance;cancer survival;central nervous system;central nervous system tumor;child;clinical trial;cohort analysis;conference abstract;controlled study;drug combination;drug efficacy;drug safety;drug therapy;ependymoma;exploratory research;female;gene expression;health care quality;human;low drug dose;major clinical study;male;medulloblastoma;pediatric patient;pharmacokinetics
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

90
checked on Mar 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.