Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3766
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLinjie, Zhangen
dc.contributor.authorKlassen, Terry P.en
dc.contributor.authorMendoza-Sassi, Raúl A.en
dc.contributor.authorWainwright, Claireen
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:45:53Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:45:53Z-
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citation136, (4), 2015, p. 687-701en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3766-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The mainstay of treatment for acute bronchiolitis remains supportive care. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) in infants with acute bronchiolitis. METHODS: Data sources included PubMed and the Virtual Health Library of the Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information up to May 2015. Studies selected were randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing nebulized HS with 0.9% saline or standard treatment. RESULTS: We included 24 trials involving 3209 patients, 1706 of whom received HS. Hospitalized patients treated with nebulized HS had a significantly shorter length of stay compared with those receiving 0.9% saline or standard care (15 trials involving 1956 patients; mean difference [MD] -0.45 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.82 to -0.08). The HS group also had a significantly lower posttreatment clinical score in the first 3 days of admission (5 trials involving 404 inpatients; day 1: MD -0.99, 95% CI -1.48 to -0.50; day 2: MD -1.45, 95% CI -2.06 to -0.85; day 3: MD -1.44, 95% CI -1.78 to -1.11). Nebulized HS reduced the risk of hospitalization by 20% compared with 0.9% saline among outpatients (7 trials involving 951 patients; risk ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.96). No significant adverse events related to HS inhalation were reported. The quality of evidence is moderate due to inconsistency in results between trials and study limitations (risk of bias). CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized HS is a safe and potentially effective treatment of infants with acute bronchiolitis.meta analysis; research; systematic review; tables/charts. Journal Subset: Biomedical; Blind Peer Reviewed; Editorial Board Reviewed; Expert Peer Reviewed; Peer Reviewed; USA. Special Interest: Evidence-Based Practice. NLM UID: 0376422.PMID: NLM26416925. <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofPediatricsen
dc.titleNebulized Hypertonic Saline for Acute Bronchiolitis: A Systematic Reviewen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1542/peds.2015-1914en
dc.subject.keywordsCochrane Libraryen
dc.subject.keywordsMedlineen
dc.subject.keywordsMeta Analysisen
dc.subject.keywordsData Analysis Softwareen
dc.subject.keywordsLength of Stayen
dc.subject.keywordsConfidence Intervalsen
dc.subject.keywordsPubMeden
dc.subject.keywordsDescriptive Statisticsen
dc.subject.keywordsSystematic Reviewen
dc.subject.keywordsHumanen
dc.subject.keywordsBronchiolitis -- Drug Therapy -- In Infancy and Childhooden
dc.subject.keywordsInfanten
dc.subject.keywordsRelative Risken
dc.subject.keywordsSaline Solution, Hypertonic -- Administration and DosageNebulizers and Vaporizersen
dc.relation.urlhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,athens&db=ccm&AN=110231514&site=ehost-liveen
dc.identifier.risid3948en
dc.description.pages687-701en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

68
checked on Apr 24, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.