Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3698
Title: The molecular and clinical landscape of infant medulloblastoma (IMB): Results and molecular analysis from a prospective, multicenter phase II trial (SJYC07)
Authors: Crawford, J.
Robinson, G. W.
Rudneva, V. A.
Buchhalter, I.
Billups, C. A.
Waszak, S. M.
Smith, K.
Bowers, D. C.
Bendel, A.
Fisher, P.
Partap, S.
Hassall, T.
Indelicato, D. J.
Boop, F.
Klimo, P.
Sabin, N. D.
Patay, Z.
Merchant, T. E.
Stewart, C. F.
Orr, B. A.
Korbel, J. O.
Jones, D. T. W.
Sharma, T.
Lichter, P.
Kool, M.
Korshunov, A.
Pfister, S. M.
Gilbertson, R. J.
Sanders, R. P.
Onar-Thomas, A.
Ellison, D. W.
Gajjar, A.
Northcott, P. A.
Issue Date: 2018
Source: 20 , 2018, p. i126-i127
Pages: i126-i127
Journal: Neuro-Oncology
Abstract: BACKGROUND: iMB has inferior survival to older children principally due to radiation-sparing therapy. To better understand which patients may benefit from radiation-sparing protocols, we describe the molecular landscape of iMB and report the iMB outcome on the SJYC07 trial designed to defer, reduce, or delay radiation exposure. METHODS: We assembled a molecular cohort of 190 iMBs and a SJYC07 trial cohort of 81 iMBs. Tumors were subclassified into molecular subgroups based on DNA methylation profiles and overlaid with mutations and copy-number alterations. PFS and OS for the SJYC07 cohort was estimated across clinical risk groups, consensus molecular subgroups, and in the context of novel MB subtypes. RESULTS: Computational analysis of DNA methylation array data divided iMB into three of the four consensus subgroups: SHH, G3, and G4 (absent WNT). Clinical outcome of iMBSHH was superior to iMBGroup3/Group4 (5-year PFS: 51 ± 8% vs 11 ± 10%, P<0.001; 5-year OS: 72 ± 8% vs 51 ± 12%, P<0.05). t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) analysis recognized two subtypes of iMBSHH (iMBSHH-I and iMBSHH-II) and distributed iMBGroup3/Group4 into eight recently described subtypes (I-VIII). 5-year PFS of iMBSHH-II surpassed iMBSHH-I (75 ± 10% vs 28 ± 10%, P=0.003) and exceeded 90% in low-risk iMBSHH-II (<3y, M0, R0, DN/MBEN). CONCLUSION: Through integrative genomics, we described the molecular landscape of iMB. Application of these data to a trial cohort identifies: a low-risk SHH-subtype (iMBSHH-II) that exhibits excellent PFS in the absence of radiation, intra-ventricular chemotherapy, and high-dose chemotherapy; a high-risk SHH-subtype (iMBSHH-I); and very poor PFS for iMBGroup3/Group4. These findings will shape risk stratification on future iMB trials.L6230987142018-07-25
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy059
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L623098714&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy059 |
Keywords: stratification;endogenous compoundWnt protein;cancer chemotherapy;clinical article;radiation exposure;risk assessment;stochastic model;clinical outcome;conference abstract;consensus;controlled study;DNA methylation;drug megadose;embedding;female;genetic susceptibility;genomics;high risk population;human;infant;landscape;male;medulloblastoma;multicenter study;mutation;phase 2 clinical trial;prospective study
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on Mar 25, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.