Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3698
Title: | The molecular and clinical landscape of infant medulloblastoma (IMB): Results and molecular analysis from a prospective, multicenter phase II trial (SJYC07) | Authors: | Crawford, J. Robinson, G. W. Rudneva, V. A. Buchhalter, I. Billups, C. A. Waszak, S. M. Smith, K. Bowers, D. C. Bendel, A. Fisher, P. Partap, S. Hassall, T. Indelicato, D. J. Boop, F. Klimo, P. Sabin, N. D. Patay, Z. Merchant, T. E. Stewart, C. F. Orr, B. A. Korbel, J. O. Jones, D. T. W. Sharma, T. Lichter, P. Kool, M. Korshunov, A. Pfister, S. M. Gilbertson, R. J. Sanders, R. P. Onar-Thomas, A. Ellison, D. W. Gajjar, A. Northcott, P. A. |
Issue Date: | 2018 | Source: | 20 , 2018, p. i126-i127 | Pages: | i126-i127 | Journal: | Neuro-Oncology | Abstract: | BACKGROUND: iMB has inferior survival to older children principally due to radiation-sparing therapy. To better understand which patients may benefit from radiation-sparing protocols, we describe the molecular landscape of iMB and report the iMB outcome on the SJYC07 trial designed to defer, reduce, or delay radiation exposure. METHODS: We assembled a molecular cohort of 190 iMBs and a SJYC07 trial cohort of 81 iMBs. Tumors were subclassified into molecular subgroups based on DNA methylation profiles and overlaid with mutations and copy-number alterations. PFS and OS for the SJYC07 cohort was estimated across clinical risk groups, consensus molecular subgroups, and in the context of novel MB subtypes. RESULTS: Computational analysis of DNA methylation array data divided iMB into three of the four consensus subgroups: SHH, G3, and G4 (absent WNT). Clinical outcome of iMBSHH was superior to iMBGroup3/Group4 (5-year PFS: 51 ± 8% vs 11 ± 10%, P<0.001; 5-year OS: 72 ± 8% vs 51 ± 12%, P<0.05). t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) analysis recognized two subtypes of iMBSHH (iMBSHH-I and iMBSHH-II) and distributed iMBGroup3/Group4 into eight recently described subtypes (I-VIII). 5-year PFS of iMBSHH-II surpassed iMBSHH-I (75 ± 10% vs 28 ± 10%, P=0.003) and exceeded 90% in low-risk iMBSHH-II (<3y, M0, R0, DN/MBEN). CONCLUSION: Through integrative genomics, we described the molecular landscape of iMB. Application of these data to a trial cohort identifies: a low-risk SHH-subtype (iMBSHH-II) that exhibits excellent PFS in the absence of radiation, intra-ventricular chemotherapy, and high-dose chemotherapy; a high-risk SHH-subtype (iMBSHH-I); and very poor PFS for iMBGroup3/Group4. These findings will shape risk stratification on future iMB trials.L6230987142018-07-25 | DOI: | 10.1093/neuonc/noy059 | Resources: | https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L623098714&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy059 | | Keywords: | stratification;endogenous compoundWnt protein;cancer chemotherapy;clinical article;radiation exposure;risk assessment;stochastic model;clinical outcome;conference abstract;consensus;controlled study;DNA methylation;drug megadose;embedding;female;genetic susceptibility;genomics;high risk population;human;infant;landscape;male;medulloblastoma;multicenter study;mutation;phase 2 clinical trial;prospective study | Type: | Article |
Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.