Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3669
Title: | The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters in Pediatrics: miniMAGIC | Authors: | Jaffray, Julie Faustino, E. Vincent S. Gore, Beth Jacobs, Jeffrey P. Ullman, Amanda Kleidon, Tricia Brown, Erin Bernstein, Steven J. Cooper, David S. Cooke, Marie Claire M, Rickard Rivard, Douglas C. Shaughnessy, Erin Stranz, Marc Wolf, Joshua Mahajan, Prashant V. McBride, Craig A. Morton, Kayce Pitts, Stephanie Doellman, Darcy |
Issue Date: | 2020 | Source: | 145 , 2020, p. S269-S284 | Pages: | S269-S284 | Journal: | Pediatrics | Abstract: | OBJECTIVES: Vascular access device decision-making for pediatric patients remains a complex, highly variable process. To date, evidence-based criteria to inform these choices do not exist. The objective of the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters in pediatrics (miniMAGIC) was to provide guidance on device selection, device characteristics, and insertion technique for clinicians, balancing and contextualizing evidence with current practice through a multidisciplinary panel of experts. METHODS: The RAND Corporation and University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method was used to develop miniMAGIC, which included the following sequential phases: definition of scope and key terms, information synthesis and literature review, expert multidisciplinary panel selection and engagement, case scenario development, and appropriateness ratings by an expert panel via 2 rounds. RESULTS: The appropriateness of the selection, characteristics, and insertion technique of intravenous catheters commonly used in pediatric health care across age populations (neonates, infants, children, and adolescents), settings, diagnoses, clinical indications, insertion locations, and vessel visualization devices and techniques was defined. Core concepts including vessel preservation, insertion and postinsertion harm minimization (eg, infection, thrombosis), undisrupted treatment provision, and inclusion of patient preferences were emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we provide evidence-based criteria for intravenous catheter selection (from umbilical catheters to totally implanted venous devices) in pediatric patients across a range of clinical indications. miniMAGIC also highlights core vascular access practices in need of collaborative research and innovation.research; tables/charts. Supplement Title: 2020 Supplement. Journal Subset: Biomedical; Blind Peer Reviewed; Editorial Board Reviewed; Expert Peer Reviewed; Peer Reviewed; USA. NLM UID: 0376422. | DOI: | 10.1542/peds.2019-3474I | Resources: | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,athens&db=ccm&AN=143561736&site=ehost-live | Keywords: | Child;Research Methodology;Catheterization, Peripheral Central Venous;Central Venous Catheters;Multidisciplinary Care Team;Decision Making;Physicians -- Education;Pediatric CareCatheters, Vascular -- Education;Catheterization -- Education;Human | Type: | Article |
Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.