Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3651
Title: | Menstrual Suppression in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients with Disabilities Ranging from Developmental to Acquired Conditions: A Population Study in an Australian Quaternary Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Service from January 2005 to December 2015 | Authors: | Bartley, C. Bagchi, T. Kimble, R. M. N. Leeks, R. O'Brien, B. |
Issue Date: | 2019 | Source: | 32, (5), 2019, p. 535-540 | Pages: | 535-540 | Journal: | Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology | Abstract: | Study Objective: The aim of this study was to review the efficacy of different medical modalities for menstrual suppression in the cohort of patients with disabilities who presented to the Queensland Paediatric and Adolescent Gynaecology (PAG) Service between January 2005 and December 2015. Menstrual suppression in adolescents with disabilities is an important aspect of care to support the patient and their carers in managing the complexities of menstrual hygiene, pain, and other discomfort associated with menses. It is important for general practitioners, pediatricians, and gynecologists to establish the right modality of suppression for each individual adolescent. Design, Settings, Participants, Interventions, and Main Outcome Measures: The study was a retrospective case notes review of 68 adolescents who presented to the Queensland PAG Service, Brisbane, Australia with a request for menstrual suppression. The medical interventions included treatment with either combined oral hormonal contraceptive, oral medroxyprogesterone, depot medroxyprogesterone, or the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena, Bayer). The primary outcome measure was success of menstrual suppression from commencement of medical intervention to achievement of complete amenorrhea or very light bleeding described as spotting, for each medical modality. Secondary outcomes were length of time from first treatment to first observed menstrual suppression, and the number of outpatient appointments taken to achieve menstrual suppression. Results: Of the 68 adolescents, 59/68 (86.8%) successfully achieved menstrual suppression, with 9/68 (13.2%) having ongoing treatment or loss to follow-up at the time of conclusion of the study; 39/68 (57.4%) were menstrually suppressed with their chosen medical modality after their initial appointment. Conclusion: Medical modalities are highly effective in achieving menstrual suppression and no young women at this institution required a hysterectomy. Depot medroxyprogesterone was the most successful modality used to achieve menstrual suppression followed by the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. The combined oral hormonal contraceptive was the least successful medical treatment in achieving menstrual suppression.L20034083732019-10-29 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.05.005 | Resources: | https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2003408373&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2019.05.005 | | Keywords: | human;hysterectomy;major clinical study;menstruation;outcome assessment;population research;priority journal;retrospective study;young adult;depo provera;implanon nxt;mirena;spotting;levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine systemethinylestradiol plus levonorgestrel;etonogestrel;levonorgestrel;medroxyprogesterone;medroxyprogesterone acetate;oral contraceptive agent;adolescent;adult;amenorrhea;article;Australia;child;cohort analysis;developmental disorder;disability;female;follow up | Type: | Article |
Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.