Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3417
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoh, G.en
dc.contributor.authorDavid, M.en
dc.contributor.authorHigashi, H.en
dc.contributor.authorThomas, D.en
dc.contributor.authorNourse, C.en
dc.contributor.authorKoorts, P.en
dc.contributor.authorClark, J. E.en
dc.contributor.authorJardine, L. A.en
dc.contributor.authorBeswick, R.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:42:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:42:08Z-
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.citation55, (11), 2019, p. 1381-1388en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3417-
dc.description.abstractAim: Targeted screening by a salivary cytomegalovirus (CMV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of infants who ‘refer’ on their newborn hearing screen has been suggested as an easy, reliable and cost-effective approach to identify and treat babies with congenital CMV (cCMV) to improve hearing outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of introducing targeted salivary cCMV testing into a newborn hearing screening programme. Methods: The study included three tertiary maternity hospitals in Queensland, Australia between August 2014 and April 2016. Infants who ‘referred’ on the newborn hearing screen were offered a salivary swab for CMV PCR at the point of referral to audiology. Swabs were routinely processed and tested for CMV DNA by real-time quantitative PCR. Parents of babies with a positive CMV PCR were notified, and the babies were medically assessed and, where appropriate, were offered treatment (oral valganciclovir). Results: Of eligible infants, the parents of 83.0% (234/283) consented to the cCMV screen. Of these, 96.6% returned a negative result (226/234), and 3.4% (8/234) returned a positive result (three true positive; five false positive). The prevalence of cCMV for infants with confirmed hearing loss was 3.64% (P = 2/55; confidence interval = 0.44–12.53%). The cost comparison suggests the cost implementation of cCMV screening (and subsequent potential treatment benefits and management over time), compared to non-screening (and subsequent management), to be negligible. Conclusion: Incorporating cCMV testing into Universal Newborn Hearing Screening within Queensland is realistic and achievable, both practically and financially.L6269467362019-04-02 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Paediatrics and Child Healthen
dc.titleIntegration of congenital cytomegalovirus screening within a newborn hearing screening programmeen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jpc.14428en
dc.subject.keywordsnewbornen
dc.subject.keywordsnewborn screeningen
dc.subject.keywordspriority journalen
dc.subject.keywordshealth programen
dc.subject.keywordscytomegalovirus infectionen
dc.subject.keywordscongenital infectionen
dc.subject.keywordsarticleauditory screeningen
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L626946736&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14428 |en
dc.identifier.risid840en
dc.description.pages1381-1388en
local.message.claim2024-06-20T09:27:14.540+1000|||rp03979|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None*
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

56
checked on Apr 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.