Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3405
Title: Insulin regimens for newly diagnosed children with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Australia and New Zealand: A survey of current practice
Authors: de Bock, M.
Benitez-Aguirre, P.
Wiltshire, E.
Tham, E.
Simm, P.
Conwell, L. S.
Carter, P. J.
Selvakumar, D.
Wheeler, B. J.
Ambler, G. R.
Al-Sallami, H. S.
Albert, B. B.
Willis, J.
Issue Date: 2017
Source: 53, (12), 2017, p. 1208-1214
Pages: 1208-1214
Journal: Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Abstract: Aim: There is no consensus on the optimal insulin treatment for children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The aims of this study were (i) to describe the insulin regimens used at diagnosis by patient age and geographical region and (ii) to explore differences between and within Australia (AU) and New Zealand (NZ) with regards to other aspects of patient management and education. Methods: An online survey of medical professionals caring for children with T1DM in AU and NZ was undertaken. Questions included clinic demographics, insulin regimen/dosing choices and patient education. Results: Of 110 clinicians identified, 100 responded (91%). The majority of those in AU (69%, P < 0.0001) favour multiple daily injections (MDI) for all ages. In NZ, for patients < 10 years old, (twice daily (BD)) BD therapy was favoured (75%, P < 0.0001), with MDI dominant for ages ≥ 10 years (82%, P < 0.0001). Insulin pump therapy was never considered at diagnosis in NZ, but 38% of clinicians in AU considered using pumps at diagnosis in patients <2 years, but rarely in patients aged 2 and over (16%). Differences in clinician choices were also seen in relation to starting insulin dose. Conclusion: This is the first study to examine current clinical practice with regards to children newly diagnosed with T1DM. Practice varies across Australasia by clinician and region. This lack of consensus is likely driven by ongoing debates in the current paediatric diabetes evidence base as well as by differences in clinician/centre preference, variations in resourcing and their interpretations of the influence of various patient factors.L6195614152017-12-12
2018-08-06
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.13631
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L619561415&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13631 |
Keywords: adult;adolescent;isophane insulin;child;continuous infusion;demography;female;geography;health survey;human;insulin dependent diabetes mellitus;male;New Zealand;online system;patient education;priority journal;apidra;humalog;lantus;novorapid;insulin lispro;insulin glulisine;insulin glargine;insulin aspartinsulin derivative;article;aged;Australia
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

54
checked on Mar 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.