Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3224
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMihala, G.en
dc.contributor.authorChaseling, B.en
dc.contributor.authorKleidon, Ten
dc.contributor.authorUllman, Amandaen
dc.contributor.authorRickard, C. M.en
dc.contributor.authorZhang, L.en
dc.contributor.authorSchoutrop, J.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:40:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:40:03Z-
dc.date.issued2018en
dc.identifier.citation13, (8), 2018, p. 517-525en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3224-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Despite the popularity of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), recent literature highlights their potential injurious complications. Innovative PICC materials have been developed to prevent thrombosis and infection formation (Endexo®) and antireflux valves to prevent occlusion (pressure-activated safety valve®). No large randomized controlled trial has assessed these technologies. Our primary aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a large randomized controlled efficacy trial of PICC materials and design to reduce PICC complication in pediatrics. METHODS: A randomized controlled feasibility trial was undertaken at the Lady Cilento Children’s Hospital in South Brisbane, Australia, between March 2016 and November 2016. Consecutive recruitment of 150 pediatric participants were randomly assigned to receive either (1) polyurethane PICC with a clamp or (2) BioFlo® PICC (AngioDynamics Inc, Queensbury, New York). Primary outcomes were trial feasibility, including PICC failure (thrombosis, occlusion, infection, breakage, or dislodgement). Secondary outcomes were PICC complications during use. RESULTS: Protocol feasibility was established, including staff and patient acceptability, timely recruitment, no missing primary outcome data, and 0% attrition. PICC failure was 22% (16 of 74, standard care) and 11% (8 of 72, BioFlo®) corresponding to 12.6 and 7.3 failures per 1000 hours (risk ratio 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-1.43; P =.172). PICC failures were primarily due to thrombosis (standard care 7% versus BioFlo® 3%) and complete occlusion (standard care 7% versus BioFlo® 1%). No blood stream infections occurred. Significantly fewer patients with BioFlo® had PICC complications during use (15% vs 34%; P =.009). CONCLUSION: BioFlo® PICCs appear potentially safer for pediatrics than traditional standard care PICCs with a clamp. Further research is required to definitively identify clinical, cost-effective methods to prevent PICC failure and improve reliability.L6236832122018-09-04 <br />2018-09-05 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Hospital Medicineen
dc.titleHow does your PICCOMPARE? A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing various PICC materials in pediatricsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.12788/jhm.2911en
dc.subject.keywordsmajor clinical studyen
dc.subject.keywordsmaleen
dc.subject.keywordsoutcome assessmenten
dc.subject.keywordspatient attitudeen
dc.subject.keywordspilot studyen
dc.subject.keywordspriority journalen
dc.subject.keywordsrandomized controlled trialen
dc.subject.keywordsschool childen
dc.subject.keywordspediatric hospitalen
dc.subject.keywords12615001290583BioFlo PICCen
dc.subject.keywordsclampen
dc.subject.keywordsperipherally inserted central venous catheteren
dc.subject.keywordspolyurethanen
dc.subject.keywordsarticleen
dc.subject.keywordsAustraliaen
dc.subject.keywordscatheter complicationen
dc.subject.keywordscatheter dislocationen
dc.subject.keywordscatheter infectionen
dc.subject.keywordscatheter occlusionen
dc.subject.keywordscatheter thrombosisen
dc.subject.keywordscentral venous catheterizationen
dc.subject.keywordschilden
dc.subject.keywordscontrolled studyen
dc.subject.keywordsdevice safetyen
dc.subject.keywordsfeasibility studyen
dc.subject.keywordsfemaleen
dc.subject.keywordshealth personnel attitudeen
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L623683212&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.12788/jhm.2911 |en
dc.identifier.risid190en
dc.description.pages517-525en
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

96
checked on Apr 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.