Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3153
Title: Health and wealth in children and adolescents with kidney transplants (K-CAD study)
Authors: Walker, A.
Francis, A.
Kara, T.
White, S.
Wong, G.
Craig, J.
Kim, S.
Howard, K.
Didsbury, M.
Van Zwieten, A.
Chen, K.
Medway, M.
Tong, A.
Turner, R.
Mackie, F.
McTaggart, S.
Issue Date: 2016
Source: 100, (7), 2016, p. S301
Pages: S301
Journal: Transplantation
Abstract: Background: Poverty and social inequality are major barriers for achieving optimal health outcomes in children, but their impact on outcomes in children after kidney transplantation remains unclear. The K-CAD study is an Australian multicentre longitudinal cohort study that aims to describe the prevalence of economic hardship among caregivers and to determine the relationship between socioeconomic status of caregivers and self-rated health of children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Method: Two hundred and ninety-three children aged 6-18 years with CKD [stage 1-2 (n=69), stage 3-5 (n=77), dialysis (n=35), transplant (n=112)] were recruited from four tertiary children's hospitals across Australia. Comparisons by quintile of socioeconomic status for nominal self-rated health outcomes among children with CKD were analysed using adjusted multinomial logistic regression. Results: The mean ages of the caregivers and children were 43.5 years (SD: 8.0) and 12.5 (SD:3.9), respectively. More than 50% of all households earned less than $1250AUD per week. Only 20% (n=60) of caregivers engaged in fulltime employment and 30% (n=89) had completed tertiary education. Across the cohort, carers who reported higher levels of financial difficulty were twice as likely to report that their child's health was poor than those with lower levels of financial difficulty (OR 2.01, [95% CI 1.2-3.3], p<0.01). Compared to children with pre end-stage disease, parents of children with a kidney transplant were more than twice as likely to report that their income had decreased since the diagnosis of their child's disease (OR 2.4, [95% CI 1.4-4.3]), and parents of children on dialysis were nearly five times as likely (OR 4.8, [95% CI 2.1-10.9], p<0.05). Socioeconomic status did not have a significant effect on access to pre-emptive transplantation or graft outcomes. Conclusion: Socioeconomic status of caregivers appears to have a profound impact on the self-rated health in children with CKD. Families of children with end stage renal disease experience more financial hardship compared to those with less severe disease. Longitudinal follow-up will help delineate the cause of socioeconomic disadvantage in these children and the long-term effects on disease progression and wellbeing outcomes.L6130047562016-11-08
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000490147.72544.1a
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L613004756&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000490147.72544.1a |
Keywords: clinical trial;cohort analysis;controlled clinical trial;controlled study;diagnosis;dialysis;disease course;education;end stage renal disease;follow up;full time employment;hospital;household;human;child;kidney graft;logistic regression analysis;major clinical study;multicenter study;preschool child;prevalence;social status;subclinical renal impairment;wellbeing;caregiver;adolescentAustralia;human tissue;child health;chronic kidney failure
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Mar 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.