Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3068
Title: Functional electrical stimulation cycling, goal-directed training, and adapted cycling for children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial
Authors: Armstrong, E. L.
Kentish, M. J.
Horan, S. A.
Boyd, R. N.
Carty, C.P. 
Ware, R. S.
Issue Date: 2020
Source: 62, (12), 2020, p. 1406-1413
Pages: 1406-1413
Journal: Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Abstract: Aim: To test the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling, goal-directed training, and adapted cycling, compared with usual care, to improve function in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Method: The intervention was delivered between 2017 and 2019 and included three sessions per week for 8 weeks (2×1h sessions at a children’s hospital, and 1h home programme/week). Hospital sessions included 30 minutes of FES cycling and 30 minutes of goal-directed training. Home programmes included goal-directed training and adapted cycling. The comparison group continued usual care. Primary outcomes were gross motor function assessed by the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) and goal performance/satisfaction assessed using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Secondary outcomes were sit-to-stand and activity capacity, participation in home, school, and community activities, and power output. Linear regression was used to determine the between-group mean difference immediately post-training completion after adjusting for baseline scores. Results: This randomized controlled trial included 21 participants (mean age=10y 3mo, standard deviation [SD]=3y; Gross Motor Function Classification System level: II=7, III=6, IV=8) who were randomized to the intervention (n=11) or usual care group (n=10). Between-group differences at T2 favoured the intervention group for GMFM-88 (mean difference=7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3–12.6; p=0.007), GMFM-66 (mean difference=5.9; 95% CI: 3.1–8.8; p<0.001), COPM performance (mean difference=4.4; 95% CI: 3.9–5.3; p<0.001) and satisfaction (mean difference=5.2; 95% CI: 4.0–6.4; p<0.001). Interpretation: Children with CP achieved meaningful functional improvements after FES cycling, goal-directed training, and adapted cycling training. Cycling programmes for children with CP should be individualized and goal directed.L20058069252020-08-11
2020-12-16
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14648
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2005806925&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14648
Keywords: comparative effectiveness;controlled study;cycling;evidence based practice;falling;female;functional assessment;functional electrical stimulation;goal attainment;Gross Motor Function Classification System;Gross Motor Function Measure;home care;human;male;motor performance;muscle fatigue;outcome assessment;parallel design;priority journal;randomized controlled trial;satisfaction;school child;training;myalgia;ACTRN12617000644369pacademic achievement;article;Canadian Occupational Performance Meaure;cerebral palsy;child;clinical article;clinical effectiveness;clinical outcome
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

78
checked on Mar 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.