Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2981
Title: FACE-Q Craniofacial Module: Part 1 validation of CLEFT-Q scales for use in children and young adults with facial conditions
Authors: Johnson, D.
Phua, Y. S.
Marucci, D. D.
Swan, M. C.
Cano, S.
Pusic, A. L.
Goodacre, T. E.
Breuning, E. E.
Klassen, A. F.
Rae, C.
Wong Riff, K. W.
Bulstrode, N.
Denadai, R.
Goldstein, J.
Hol, M. L.
Murray, D. J.
Bracken, S.
Courtemanche, D. J.
O'Hara, J.
Butler, D.
Tassi, A.
Malic, C. C.
Ganske, I. M.
Issue Date: 2021
Source: 74, (9), 2021, p. 2319-2329
Pages: 2319-2329
Journal: Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
Abstract: Background: The CLEFT-Q includes 12 independently functioning scales that measure appearance (face, nose, nostrils, teeth, lips, jaws), health-related quality of life (psychological, social, school, speech distress), and speech function, and an eating/drinking checklist. Previous qualitative research revealed that the CLEFT-Q has content validity in noncleft craniofacial conditions. This study aimed to examine the psychometric performance of the CLEFT-Q in an international sample of patients with a broad range of facial conditions. Methods: Data were collected between October 2016 and December 2019 from 2132 patients aged 8 to 29 years with noncleft facial conditions. Rasch measurement theory (RMT) analysis was used to examine Differential Item Function (DIF) by comparing the original CLEFT-Q sample and the new FACE-Q craniofacial sample. Reliability and validity of the scales in a combined cleft and craniofacial sample (n=4743) were examined. Results: DIF was found for 23 CLEFT-Q items when the datasets for the two samples were compared. When items with DIF were split by sample, correlations between the original and split person locations showed that DIF had negligible impact on scale scoring (correlations ≥0.995). In the combined sample, RMT analysis led to the retention of original content for ten CLEFT-Q scales, modification of the Teeth scale, and the addition of an Eating/Drinking scale. Data obtained fit with the Rasch model for 11 scales (exception School, p=0.04). Person Separation Index and Cronbach alpha values met the criteria. Conclusion: The scales described in this study can be used to measure outcomes in children and young adults with cleft and noncleft craniofacial conditions.L20135866322021-07-23
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.040
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2013586632&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.040 |
Keywords: content validity;controlled study;Cronbach alpha coefficient;facial nerve paralysis;facies;female;follow up;human;human tissue;major clinical study;male;child;psychometry;quality of life;Rasch analysis;rating scale;speech disorder;young adult;article;adolescentadult;measurement;cleft lip palate;cleft q scale
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Queensland Health Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

98
checked on Jul 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.