Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2797
Title: | Efficacy and safety of elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor versus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for F508del-CFTR: a 24-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3b trial | Authors: | Mall, M. A. Sutharsan, S. McKone, E. F. Downey, D. G. Duckers, J. MacGregor, G. Tullis, E. Van Braeckel, E. Wainwright, Claire Watson, D. Ahluwalia, N. Bruinsma, B. G. Harris, C. Lam, A. P. Lou, Y. Moskowitz, S. M. Tian, S. Yuan, J. Waltz, D. |
Issue Date: | 2022 | Source: | Mar 10, (3), 2022, p. 267-277 | Pages: | 267-277 | Journal: | Lancet Respir Med | Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor is a triple-combination cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator regimen shown to be generally safe and efficacious in people with cystic fibrosis aged 12 years or older with at least one F508del-CFTR allele. We aimed to assess the magnitude and durability of the clinical effects of this triple combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3b trial of elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor at 35 medical centres in Australia, Belgium, Germany, and the UK. Eligible participants were those with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation, aged 12 years or older with stable disease, and with a percent predicted FEV(1) of 40-90% inclusive. After a 4-week run-in period, in which participants received tezacaftor 100 mg orally once daily and ivacaftor 150 mg orally every 12 h, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 24 weeks of either elexacaftor 200 mg orally once daily plus tezacaftor 100 mg orally once daily plus ivacaftor 150 mg orally every 12 h (elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group) or tezacaftor 100 mg orally once daily plus ivacaftor 150 mg orally every 12 h (tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group). Randomisation was stratified by percent predicted FEV(1), age at screening visit, and whether the participant was receiving CFTR modulators at the time of the screening visit. Patients, investigators, and sponsor's study execution team were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the absolute change in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) respiratory domain score from baseline (ie, at the end of the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor run-in period) up to and including week 24. The key secondary endpoint was the absolute change from baseline in percent predicted FEV(1) up to and including week 24; other secondary endpoints were the absolute change from baseline in sweat chloride concentrations up to and including week 24, and safety and tolerability. All endpoints were assessed in all randomised patients who had received at least one dose of their assigned regimen. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04105972. FINDINGS: Between Oct 3, 2019, and July 24, 2020, 176 participants were enrolled. Following the 4-week tezacaftor plus ivacaftor run-in period, 175 participants were randomly assigned (87 to the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group and 88 to the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group) and dosed in the treatment period. From baseline up to and including week 24, the mean CFQ-R respiratory domain score increased by 17·1 points (95% CI 14·1 to 20·1) in the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group and by 1·2 points (-1·7 to 4·2) in the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group (least squares mean treatment difference 15·9 points [95% CI 11·7 to 20·1], p<0·0001), the mean percent predicted FEV(1) increased by 11·2 percentage points (95% CI 9·8 to 12·6) in the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group and by 1·0 percentage points (-0·4 to 2·4) in the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group (least squares mean treatment difference 10·2 percentage points [8·2 to 12·1], p<0·0001), and the mean sweat chloride concentration decreased by 46·2 mmol/L (95% CI 43·7 to 48·7) in the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group and by 3·4 mmol/L (1·0 to 5·8) in the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group (least squares mean treatment difference -42·8 mmol/L [-46·2 to -39·3], nominal p<0·0001). Most participants (70 [80%] in the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group and 74 [84%] in the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group) had adverse events that were mild or moderate in severity; serious adverse events occurred in five (6%) of 87 participants in the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group and 14 (16%) of 88 participants in the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group. One (1%) participant in the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group discontinued treatment due to an adverse event of anxiety and depression. Two (2%) participants in the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group discontinued treatment due to adverse events of psychotic disorder (n=1) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (n=1). INTERPRETATION: The elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor regimen was safe and well tolerated, and led to significant and clinically meaningful improvements in respiratory-related quality of life and lung function, as well as improved CFTR function, changes that were durable over 24 weeks and superior to those seen with tezacaftor plus ivacaftor in this patient population. FUNDING: Vertex Pharmaceuticals.2213-2619Sutharsan, Sivagurunathan | DOI: | 10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00454-9 | Keywords: | from Vertex Pharmaceuticals for the submitted work;and institutional grants from;Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos, and Abbvie for other cystic fibrosis-related;trials. MAM received personal fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals during the conduct;of the study;grants from Vertex Pharmaceuticals;and personal fees from;Boehringer Ingelheim, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Vertex Pharmaceuticals,;Santhera, Galapagos, Sterna Biologicals, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotech,;and Antabio outside of the submitted work. ET received grants and non-financial;support from Vertex Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the study;grants from;Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Spyryx, Horizon, Corbus, and Celtaxis;personal fees from Proteostasis and Horizon;and non-financial support from;Proteostasis and Spyryx outside of the submitted work. CEW received institutional;grants from Vertex Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the study;Novo Nordisk outside of the submitted work;and personal fees from Vertex;Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, DKBmed, Gilead, and In Vivo;Academy outside of the submitted work. DWal and SMM have pending patents for;methods of treatment for cystic fibrosis, pharmaceutical compositions for;treatment of cystic fibrosis, compositions and methods for treatment of cystic;have issued patents for crystalline forms and compositions of CFTR modulators.;NA, BGB, CH, APL, YL, SMM, ST, JY, and DWal are employees of Vertex;Pharmaceuticals and might own stock or stock options in the company. GM and DWat;declare no competing interests.;fibrosis, and crystalline forms and compositions of CFTR modulators. DWal and SMM;Aminophenols/therapeutic useBenzodioxoles/therapeutic use;Child;Chloride Channel Agonists/therapeutic use;*Cystic Fibrosis/drug therapy/genetics;Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator/genetics;Double-Blind Method;Humans;Indoles;Mutation;Pyrazoles;Pyridines;Pyrrolidines;Quality of Life;Quinolones;Therapeutics, Novartis Pharma, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Chiesi, and Teva outside;of the submitted work;and grants from Galapagos, Proteostasis Therapeutics,;Celtaxsys, Flatley, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Teva, Chiesi, Boehringer Ingelheim,;Corbus Pharmaceuticals, and Ionis Pharmaceuticals outside of the submitted work.;EFM received personal fees and grants from Vertex Pharmaceuticals during the;conduct of the study;personal fees from Roche Pharmaceuticals, Insmed, and;Janssen Pharmaceuticals;and other financial support from A Menarini outside of;the submitted work. DGD received non-financial support from Vertex;Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the study;personal fees from Vertex;Pharmaceuticals, Proteostasis, and Chiesi;and grants from Chiesi outside of the;submitted work. JD received advisory board and speaker fees from Vertex;Pharmaceuticals outside of the submitted work. EVB received institutional grants | Type: | Article |
Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.