Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2779
Title: Effectiveness of topical silicone gel and pressure garment therapy for burn scar prevention and management in children: a randomized controlled trial
Authors: Ware, R. S.
Tyack, Z.
Simons, M.
Wiseman, J.
Kimble, R. 
Dotta, A.
McPhail, S.
Issue Date: 2020
Source: 34, (1), 2020, p. 120-131
Pages: 120-131
Journal: Clinical rehabilitation
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of silicone and pressure garments (alone and in combination) in children receiving scar management post-burn. DESIGN: Multicentre, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Hospital outpatient clinics, colocated research centre, or the participant's home. PARTICIPANTS: Children (0-18 years) referred for burn scar management. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to (1) topical silicone gel only, (2) pressure garment therapy only, or (3) combined topical silicone gel and pressure garment therapy. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes included scar thickness and itch intensity at the primary end-point of six months post-burn injury. The outcome assessor and data analyst were blinded for scar thickness. RESULTS: Participants (N = 153; silicone n = 51, pressure n = 49, combined n = 53) had a median (inter-quartile range) age of 4.9 (1.6, 10.2) years and percent total body surface area burn of 1% (0.5%, 3%) and were 65% male. At six months post-burn injury, intention-to-treat analysis identified thinner scars in the silicone (n = 51 scar sites) compared to the combined group (n = 48 scar sites; mean difference (95% confidence interval) = -0.04 cm (-0.07, -0.00), P = 0.05). No other between-group differences were identified for scar thickness or itch intensity at six months post-burn. CONCLUSION: No difference was identified in the effectiveness of silicone and pressure interventions alone. No benefit to a combined silicone and pressure intervention was identified for the prevention and management of abnormal scarring in children at six months post-burn injury, compared to the silicone or pressure interventions alone.L6294592402019-10-04
DOI: 10.1177/0269215519877516
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L629459240&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215519877516 |
Keywords: complication;compression bandage;controlled study;female;human;hypertrophic scar;infant;silicone geladolescent;preschool child;randomized controlled trial;treatment outcome;male;burn;child;clothing;age
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

98
checked on Mar 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.