Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2779
Title: | Effectiveness of topical silicone gel and pressure garment therapy for burn scar prevention and management in children: a randomized controlled trial | Authors: | Ware, R. S. Tyack, Z. Simons, M. Wiseman, J. Kimble, R. Dotta, A. McPhail, S. |
Issue Date: | 2020 | Source: | 34, (1), 2020, p. 120-131 | Pages: | 120-131 | Journal: | Clinical rehabilitation | Abstract: | OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of silicone and pressure garments (alone and in combination) in children receiving scar management post-burn. DESIGN: Multicentre, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Hospital outpatient clinics, colocated research centre, or the participant's home. PARTICIPANTS: Children (0-18 years) referred for burn scar management. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to (1) topical silicone gel only, (2) pressure garment therapy only, or (3) combined topical silicone gel and pressure garment therapy. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes included scar thickness and itch intensity at the primary end-point of six months post-burn injury. The outcome assessor and data analyst were blinded for scar thickness. RESULTS: Participants (N = 153; silicone n = 51, pressure n = 49, combined n = 53) had a median (inter-quartile range) age of 4.9 (1.6, 10.2) years and percent total body surface area burn of 1% (0.5%, 3%) and were 65% male. At six months post-burn injury, intention-to-treat analysis identified thinner scars in the silicone (n = 51 scar sites) compared to the combined group (n = 48 scar sites; mean difference (95% confidence interval) = -0.04 cm (-0.07, -0.00), P = 0.05). No other between-group differences were identified for scar thickness or itch intensity at six months post-burn. CONCLUSION: No difference was identified in the effectiveness of silicone and pressure interventions alone. No benefit to a combined silicone and pressure intervention was identified for the prevention and management of abnormal scarring in children at six months post-burn injury, compared to the silicone or pressure interventions alone.L6294592402019-10-04 | DOI: | 10.1177/0269215519877516 | Resources: | https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L629459240&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215519877516 | | Keywords: | complication;compression bandage;controlled study;female;human;hypertrophic scar;infant;silicone geladolescent;preschool child;randomized controlled trial;treatment outcome;male;burn;child;clothing;age | Type: | Article |
Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.