Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2592
Title: | Development of a paediatric central venous access device database: A retrospective cohort study of practice evolution and risk factors for device failure | Authors: | Mihala, G. Ullman, Amanda Chaseling, B. Rudkin, J. McBride, C. A. Kleidon, T Rickard, C. M. Schults, J. A. |
Issue Date: | 2020 | Source: | 56, (2), 2020, p. 289-297 | Pages: | 289-297 | Journal: | Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health | Abstract: | Aim: To describe practice evolution, complications and risk factors for multiple insertion attempts and device failure in paediatric central venous access devices (CVADs). Methods: A paediatric retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from CVAD database 2012–2014. Data included were patient (i.e. age, condition), insertion (i.e. indication, device, technique) and removal (complications, dwell). Descriptive statistics and incidence rates were calculated per calendar year and compared. Risk factors for multiple insertion attempts and failure were explored with logistic regression and cox regression, respectively. Results: A total of 1308 CVADs were observed over 273 467 catheter-days in 863 patients. Multiple insertion attempts remained static (14%) and significantly associated with non-haematological oncology (odds ratio 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–4.43), respiratory (3.71; 1.10–12.5), gastroenterology (4.18; 1.66–10.5) and other (difficult intravenous access) (2.74; 1.27–5.92). CVAD failure decreased from 35% (2012) to 25% (2014), incidence rate from 1.50 (95% CI 1.25–1.80) to 1.28 (1.06–1.54) per 1000 catheter-days. Peripherally inserted CVAD failure was significantly associated with lower body weight (per kilogram decrease, hazard ratio (HR) 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.03), cephalic vein (1.62; 1.05–2.62), difficult access (1.92; 1.02–3.73), sub-optimal tip placement (1.69; 1.06–2.69) and gastroenterology diagnosis (2.27; 1.05–4.90). Centrally placed CVAD failure was significantly associated with younger age (per year, HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00–1.07), tunnelled device (3.38; 2.41–4.73) and gastroenterology diagnosis (1.70; 1.06–2.73). Conclusions: While advancement in CVAD practices improved overall CVAD insertion and failure outcomes, further improvements and innovation are necessary to ensure improved vessel health and preservation for children requiring CVAD.L20025430532019-08-27 | DOI: | 10.1111/jpc.14600 | Resources: | https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2002543053&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14600 | | Keywords: | cephalic vein;child;child care;clinical effectiveness;cohort analysis;controlled study;device failure;device safety;equipment design;female;high risk population;human;infant;catheter complication;male;outcome assessment;priority journal;retrospective study;risk assessment;risk factor;body weight;article;age;central venous catheteradolescent;major clinical study;catheter infection;catheter removal;catheterization | Type: | Article |
Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.