Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/249
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBroom, Alexen
dc.contributor.authorKirby, Emmaen
dc.contributor.authorScambler, Grahamen
dc.contributor.authorBroom, Jenniferen
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-16T20:31:26Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-16T20:31:26Z-
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citation27, (13), 2017, p. 1924-1935en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/249-
dc.description.abstractWe are likely moving rapidly toward a post-antibiotic era, as a result of escalating antimicrobial resistance, rapidly declining antibiotic production and profligate overuse. Hitherto research has almost exclusively focused on doctors’ prescribing, with nurses’ roles in antibiotic use remaining virtually invisible. Drawing on interviews with 30 nurses, we focus on nurses as brokers of doctors’ antibiotic decisions, nursing capacity to challenge doctors’ decisions, and, 'back stage' strategies for circumnavigating organizational constraints. We argue that nurses occupy an essential and conscious position as brokers within the hospital; a subject position that is not neutral, facilitates (short-term) cohesion, and involves the pursuit of particular (preferred) nursing outcomes. Illustrating how authority can be diffuse, mediated by institutionalized praxis, and how professionals evade attempts to govern their practice, we challenge the reification of physician prescribing power, arguing that it may work against the utilization of nurses as important stakeholders in the future of antibiotics. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Release Date: 20171207. Publication Type: Journal (0100), Peer Reviewed Journal (0110). Format Covered: Electronic. Document Type: Journal Article. Language: English. Major Descriptor: Health Care Costs; Professional Development; Sociology. Classification: Health & Mental Health Services (3370). Population: Human (10); Male (30); Female (40). Age Group: Adulthood (18 yrs & older) (300). Methodology: Empirical Study; Quantitative Study. Page Count: 12. Issue Publication Date: Nov, 2017. Copyright Statement: The Author(s). 2016.Sponsor: Australian Research Council, Australia. Grant: LP140100020. Other Details: via Linkage Grant. Recipients: No recipient indicated <br />Sponsor: Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases, Australia. Recipients: No recipient indicated <br />en
dc.languageenen
dc.relation.ispartofQualitative Health Researchen
dc.titleNurses as antibiotic brokers: Institutionalized praxis in the hospitalen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1049732316679953en
dc.subject.keywordshealth careinterprofessionalen
dc.subject.keywordshealth care professionalen
dc.subject.keywordssociologyen
dc.subject.keywordsAustraliaen
dc.subject.keywordsAustraliansen
dc.subject.keywordsinterviewsen
dc.subject.keywordsqualitativeen
dc.subject.keywordsAsia-Pacificen
dc.subject.keywordsHealth Care Costsen
dc.subject.keywordsProfessional Developmenten
dc.relation.urlhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,athens&db=psyh&AN=2017-49815-003&site=ehost-livea.broom@unsw.edu.auen
dc.identifier.risid1190en
dc.description.pages1924-1935en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Sites:Sunshine Coast HHS Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

160
checked on Apr 24, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.